<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with aidiocracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with aidiocracy]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/aidiocracy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:54:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/aidiocracy.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;m tired of bookmarking case after scandalous case of how the mass use of LLM for things they can&#x27;t do is making the world a bit more like Idiocracy.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@bms48 @malte  Sidebar:I can't get as far as the point this site may or may not be making because I can't read it.Really *really* not liking it.  Why is it so human-hostile?  I don't really have a problem with the text itself being opaque to the point where I have a hard time discerning its intended meaning (I would have enjoyed it before long covid made language difficult), but the formatting defaults to *unreadable* for me. In portrait screen reader mode, the pages are twice as wide as my screen.  In portrait browser mode, the text is less than half as wide as my screen.  Zooming aggravates my arthritis because I have to keep careful control of horizontal motion during vertical swiping.  (Landscape is slightly better - in browser mode the text is up to half my screen width and potentially readable if I don't mind a headache after the first couple of paragraphs, and landscape screen reader text is a readable font size and fills the screen but is *intensely* annoying to try and read text because it shows about five lines at a time.)  Using text-to-speech won't help because my capacity for parsing spoken content is much lower than my capacity for written content.HTML was *designed* to fix this by providing markup that everyone's browser could interpret client side to match their client's preferences.I'm not sure I trust someone with this degree of hostility for their reader to present a fair read on how human-hostile LLMs are.Grrr.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/d2e7c86b-3804-4dcc-a67b-21f61f41f00a/i-m-tired-of-bookmarking-case-after-scandalous-case-of-how-the-mass-use-of-llm-for-things-they-can-t-do-is-making-the-world-a-bit-more-like-idiocracy.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/d2e7c86b-3804-4dcc-a67b-21f61f41f00a/i-m-tired-of-bookmarking-case-after-scandalous-case-of-how-the-mass-use-of-llm-for-things-they-can-t-do-is-making-the-world-a-bit-more-like-idiocracy.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[robotistry@fediscience.org]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>