<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with certified]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with certified]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/certified</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:03:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/certified.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Well, it looks like #MobilePay reverted to check Play Integrity again.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@nomad99 @artelse @volla @jolla in Finland, we do have an API that apps can use to validate one's identity via bank credentials. But if banks move to force Play Integrity, we can't approve the bank login to validate one's identity. Which makes it impossible to login on public services, tax office, health care, etc. We are slowly becoming dependent on a Google Certified device to identify who we are. And that is the problem. #Volla, #Jolla, #Murena #HMD Secure devices would be penalized because we take EU Digital Sovereignty seriously and offer deGoogled devices. #Murena e/OS is also on the same boat if Play Integrity is the only way that developers use to check device integrity.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/f1e8bfc8-f509-4e4d-9ffb-5372144f4ad1/well-it-looks-like-mobilepay-reverted-to-check-play-integrity-again.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/f1e8bfc8-f509-4e4d-9ffb-5372144f4ad1/well-it-looks-like-mobilepay-reverted-to-check-play-integrity-again.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[denzilferreira@techhub.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>