<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with deadinternetthe]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with deadinternetthe]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/deadinternetthe</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:29:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/deadinternetthe.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Remember, kids:]]></title><description><![CDATA[@juergen_hubert Good reminder! One thing I'm missing from your description: Can you have competing scientific theories in your definition? I'm reminded of Kuhn's concept of paradigms which entails that there is always some conflicting evidence that any paradigm tends to dismiss (as noise, mistakes etc). Paradigms tend to shift when the conflicting evidence becomes overwhelming and a new theory manages to account for those previous exceptions.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/2ef4b6bc-b510-4332-a8ab-39e590f3d7bf/remember-kids</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/2ef4b6bc-b510-4332-a8ab-39e590f3d7bf/remember-kids</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[malte@radikal.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>