<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with fundthefutureyo]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with fundthefutureyo]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/fundthefutureyo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 22:53:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/fundthefutureyo.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[I have a question: Why are we still in business with Elsevier in 2026?]]></title><description><![CDATA[@brembs @StephanMatthiesen @PeterKraker Regulation would help! Still, I have two concerns:1. If such regulations are not applied at a big scale (eg, at least EU-wide, preferably internationally), won't prestige still remain desirable for many? This would give researchers under different legislation or privately funded projects an advantage or might create bad incentives to switch funding.2. How can we overcome the existing association of pecuniary prestige with high quality in many fields?]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c8745a20-01d3-4e0b-9f45-00d4aa95e813/i-have-a-question-why-are-we-still-in-business-with-elsevier-in-2026</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c8745a20-01d3-4e0b-9f45-00d4aa95e813/i-have-a-question-why-are-we-still-in-business-with-elsevier-in-2026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[linqlover@norden.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>