<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with greeneconomy]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with greeneconomy]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/greeneconomy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:59:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/greeneconomy.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Going green.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@royaards The airplanes are a fun particular.The most reasonable option besides just using ships to replace them is to use airships (now without fossil fuels).I'm uncertain which uses the most resources per traveler moved, but I suspect non-fossil naval ships would win out from not having to fight so hard for their buoyancy.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/4c5ed747-41fb-43f5-9977-5d52381eb016/going-green.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/4c5ed747-41fb-43f5-9977-5d52381eb016/going-green.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lispi314@udongein.xyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>