<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with helmets]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with helmets]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/helmets</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 04:22:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/helmets.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[One of the key negative impacts of mandatory bike helmet laws is that they are essentially a death sentence for bike share programs.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@lerk @juliette I think this is still an evasion of the point. I'm saying that what validates using a helmet is that even if your chance of hitting your head is half as high as when when the kinetic energy when you do, is likely to be much higher.But i don't disagree that traffic ought to be optimized for cyclists and other "soft" travellers, rather than for motorists. Wearing a helmet doesn't have any bearing on the most dangerous risks of riding a bike.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/89795cd1-c466-4bf3-912b-77a815d7ea4e/one-of-the-key-negative-impacts-of-mandatory-bike-helmet-laws-is-that-they-are-essentially-a-death-sentence-for-bike-share-programs.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/89795cd1-c466-4bf3-912b-77a815d7ea4e/one-of-the-key-negative-impacts-of-mandatory-bike-helmet-laws-is-that-they-are-essentially-a-death-sentence-for-bike-share-programs.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rasmus91@fosstodon.org]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>