<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with opensocialweb]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with opensocialweb]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/opensocialweb</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:40:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/opensocialweb.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Is the Bluesky kind of federation an example for the future of the Fediverse?]]></title><description><![CDATA[@gelbphoenix nice, short and to the point. There are benefits to the layering introduced by ATproto (including nomadic identities and portable content), but they can be brought to the Fediverse without the centralization commanded by AT (see e.g. the nomadic protocol of Hubzilla and streams, or the Portable Objects FEP, see also &lt;https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/nomadic-identity-for-the-fediverse/2101/96&gt;)]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/d06a73d5-55f9-45f0-8a97-240aeacfa542/is-the-bluesky-kind-of-federation-an-example-for-the-future-of-the-fediverse</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/d06a73d5-55f9-45f0-8a97-240aeacfa542/is-the-bluesky-kind-of-federation-an-example-for-the-future-of-the-fediverse</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[oblomov@sociale.network]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>