<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with shortbread]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with shortbread]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/shortbread</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:18:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/shortbread.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Another #OpenStreetMap rendering comparison: City of Kiel.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@glowl Maybe I should make railways more prominent in  my style, I actually thought about that. Right now they are thin lines, although the stations are clearly visible. I agree that highways are very dominant - more in Carto than in my style, but still. On the other hand, you can see busstops, cycleways, bikeparking and (foot) paths, pedestrian streets and areas, even they are not loud.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c0a360fb-cddc-415b-8466-bce550b6e5a3/another-openstreetmap-rendering-comparison-city-of-kiel.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c0a360fb-cddc-415b-8466-bce550b6e5a3/another-openstreetmap-rendering-comparison-city-of-kiel.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[anderslund@expressional.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>