<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with trophylab]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with trophylab]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/trophylab</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 07:16:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/tags/trophylab.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[#Military secrets are fiercely guarded for obvious reasons.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@benroyce @gabriel @NathanMurdock AFAIK NATO doctrine stipulates any minor-scale nuclear attack (utilisation of tactical nukes or dirty bombs; critically attacking civil nuclear infrastructure) will be countered with an 'overwhelming conventional response'.Putin knows NATO still has some nasty stuff in their back pocket below the nuclear threshold.My very personal guess is that German Taurus have not been released for that very reason.]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/5228921f-2977-4fb5-abc2-95107eca9142/military-secrets-are-fiercely-guarded-for-obvious-reasons.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/5228921f-2977-4fb5-abc2-95107eca9142/military-secrets-are-fiercely-guarded-for-obvious-reasons.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gahmiaf@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>