<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[For the record, even Librewolf doesn&#x27;t have an official &quot;No AI&quot; stance.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@Vivaldi/116665745684315101" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>social.vivaldi.net/@Vivaldi/11</span><span>6665745684315101</span></a></p><p>For the record, even Librewolf doesn't have an official "No AI" stance. I'm pretty happy with LW for the time being - it's pretty bare bones but I actually prefer that; even Zen, which I also liked, was too focused on "More features!" - but it wouldn't take much for me to switch. </p><p>The most annoying part of that is actually that bouncing bookmarks, sessions etc. between Vivaldi &amp; LW is a bit cumbersome because one is Mozilla &amp; the other is Chromium... </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/browsers" rel="tag">#<span>browsers</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" rel="tag">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/ux" rel="tag">#<span>ux</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/02e1c67e-cb91-4207-a358-b9ff01652390/for-the-record-even-librewolf-doesn-t-have-an-official-no-ai-stance.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:00:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/02e1c67e-cb91-4207-a358-b9ff01652390.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 04:52:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>