<![CDATA[And yet, who has fought like no other against nuclear power, a technology that could have reduced carbon emissions significantly a long, long time ago?]]>RE: https://mastodon.social/@greenpeace/116985276138830393

And yet, who has fought like no other against nuclear power, a technology that could have reduced carbon emissions significantly a long, long time ago? Oh, that's right, Greenpeace!

So it does sound quite hollow, coming from them.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/0860e3f8-9905-43d8-ba08-f30d95699b75/and-yet-who-has-fought-like-no-other-against-nuclear-power-a-technology-that-could-have-reduced-carbon-emissions-significantly-a-long-long-time-agoRSS for NodeTue, 25 Aug 2026 02:43:08 GMTMon, 27 Jul 2026 06:06:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to And yet, who has fought like no other against nuclear power, a technology that could have reduced carbon emissions significantly a long, long time ago? on Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:49:03 GMT]]>@oz1sej No, it couldn't have - that's wishful thinking, even before we start talking about all the other problems connected with trying to solve emissions by switching to nuclear.

GP has published a number of scientifically well-documented plans for better energy infrastructure, which have been ridiculed or ignored.

In other words, stupid comment. Do better.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/116997209661863591https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/116997209661863591Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:49:03 GMT