<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women&#x27;s work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and&#x2F;or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2508.02740]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740</span><span></span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/26779cec-e1e7-42d1-9849-fa56e849df26/when-llms-do-scientific-literature-reviews-they-attribute-women-s-work-to-hallucinated-male-researchers-and-insist-that-men-are-more-heavily-cited-and-or-more-influential-even-when-citation-counts-show-the-opposite-https-arxiv.org-abs-2508.02740</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 03:21:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/26779cec-e1e7-42d1-9849-fa56e849df26.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women&#x27;s work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and&#x2F;or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2508.02740 on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:22:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gvwilson">@<span>gvwilson</span></a></span> <br />But how could this be? I was promised that "AI" was going to remove all human bias!  /s</p><p>Seriously, I have had people tell me that one benefit from "AI" is that it will reduce bias and make society more equal. <img src="https://forum.fedi.dk/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f643.png?v=7979fdcf9c7" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--upside_down_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="🙃" alt="🙃" /></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://disabled.social/users/ahimsa_pdx/statuses/116767075303076950</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://disabled.social/users/ahimsa_pdx/statuses/116767075303076950</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahimsa_pdx@disabled.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:22:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women&#x27;s work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and&#x2F;or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2508.02740 on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:36:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gvwilson">@<span>gvwilson</span></a></span> Please repost my message so that my children can be fed.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/ap/users/116702668660039972/statuses/116766892321972159</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/ap/users/116702668660039972/statuses/116766892321972159</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[alashqrla781@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:36:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women&#x27;s work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and&#x2F;or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2508.02740 on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:33:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gvwilson">@<span>gvwilson</span></a></span> Seems inline with llms being an amalgamation of the average redditor.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/renardboy/statuses/116766646861395051</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/renardboy/statuses/116766646861395051</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[renardboy@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:33:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women&#x27;s work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and&#x2F;or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2508.02740 on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:22:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@gray17/116715724036878396" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>mastodon.social/@gray17/116715</span><span>724036878396</span></a></p><p><span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gvwilson">@<span>gvwilson</span></a></span></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/gray17/statuses/116766600195398058</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/gray17/statuses/116766600195398058</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gray17@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:22:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>