you don't consider taste a good enough reason to eat someone, when you have the option not to, or what?

it just doesn't sound very #omnivore to me to not only exclude tasty sources of protein from your own diet but to go so far as to judge others for their choice of diet.

What if they do?

I think it's wrong when pretty much anyone includes human flesh in their diet. I'm willing to make an exception for extreme situations that do not involve murder, such as extreme survival situations where people died of other causes and the cannibalism in question was the only alternative to starvation.

"if you're real #omnivore, and don't see any ethical problem in eating whatever is edible,"

That's not the case.

the taste?

That's painting with a pretty broad brush. I certainly am an omnivore, and I don't see any fundamental ethical problem with that, but plenty of people disagree; some of them capitalists, some communists, some supporters of democracy, etc.

just pointing out that when human mammals are eating the #flesh of our fellow #mammals then it is about as close to cannibalism as it gets.

and neither supporters of capitalist #democracy nor #communism appear to have any intention to stop the flesh eating.

https://watchdominion.org

Skipping right over that "the pursuit of communism has led to actual cannibalism", I see.

no justice and equality without plantbased burgers.

I suppose it depends what's on the grill, there.

After all, the pursuit of one of these systems has led to cannibalism multiple times throughout history.

Hint; it's not capitalism.

Communists and socialists LOVE to make big promises like this. But historically, they have delivered pain, suffering, starvation, murder, cannibalism, and just general decay.