<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[There really are some stupid things in Tahoe, though - like for example, who decided that screensaver settings should now be several clicks deeper than desktop settings?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://helvede.net/@jwcph/116722025508889314" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>helvede.net/@jwcph/11672202550</span><span>8889314</span></a></p><p>There really are some stupid things in Tahoe, though - like for example, who decided that screensaver settings should now be several clicks deeper than desktop settings? Those were equally prioritized before which I find logical, but Apparently Apple's logic says people change their desktops &amp; lock screen backgrounds more often than their screensaver...? </p><p>- and why is the system settings window only resizable vertically &amp; not horizontally?</p><p><img src="https://forum.fedi.dk/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f914.png?v=7979fdcf9c7" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--thinking_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="🤔" alt="🤔" /></p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/ux" rel="tag">#<span>ux</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/apple" rel="tag">#<span>apple</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/2a9fef01-4a0f-49b9-8e98-bee8757a4dcf/there-really-are-some-stupid-things-in-tahoe-though-like-for-example-who-decided-that-screensaver-settings-should-now-be-several-clicks-deeper-than-desktop-settings</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:50:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/2a9fef01-4a0f-49b9-8e98-bee8757a4dcf.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:10:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>