Additionally: The problem he identifies is only that they may be open to lawsuits and not that they're filtering out a load of qualified and experienced candidates?

Also that the only issue was ageism (I'd be shocked if this approach didn't also discount most female candidates, though the 'youthful energy' bit of the prompt will almost certainly filter out anyone who has age-related signals in their CV).

It appears that this is the original tweet (xcancel because I don't want to send traffic to the Nazi Bar, remove the 'cancel' from the URL to avoid the mirror).

The post appears to be trying to drive traffic to his legal AI newsletter. So I suspect it's a made-up story by someone trying to sell legal-adjacent advice.

My CV doesn't mention my education at all, nor does it include all of the work I've done because then it would get too long.

This is a strong point. Perhaps he got an LLM to tweet it for him.

AI -- do stupid things instantaneously!

I'm willing to bet there are and will be thousands of instances of people in important positions using LLMs to make decisions for them and have no idea what criteria was actually used.

The decision spit out may look great at first blush, but, as in this case, be hugely problematic.

Um genau sowas in den Standards zu verhindern.

Ageism as a Service. Cool, cool.

these old farts with decades of experience will just annoy managers by telling them that their great ideas cost about 1000x of what they believe and only bring 1/1000 of the effect they hope for.

it’s much better to work with younger less experienced people…