<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine allocated the majority of the land to a Jewish state, even though Jews were a minority of the population and owned only a small fraction of the land.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>"The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine allocated the majority of the land to a Jewish state, even though Jews were a minority of the population and owned only a small fraction of the land. The war that followed, the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, produced the mass displacement and killing of Palestinians. In that sense, the creation of Israel represents a foundational contradiction — an original sin within the supposedly rules-based international order.</p><p>Yet the political conversation rarely confronts that contradiction. Instead, it fixates on the ritual question of whether Israel has a “right to exist.” In reality, international law does not recognize such a right for states; it recognizes the right of peoples to self-determination and prohibits territorial conquest. The question functions less as a legal inquiry than as a political litmus test.</p><p>As Mohammed El-Kurd has argued, this framing forces Palestinians and others into a rhetorical trap. Rather than addressing dispossession, occupation, or unequal rights, they are first required to perform a moral certification assuring the world they do not seek violence before their political grievances can even be heard. The result is a debate that substitutes abstract pledges for the material realities of military rule, displacement, and statelessness.</p><p>The answer to those two fundamental questions should start with the fact that the very order itself was founded on an initial contradiction that set it up for hypocrisy — and hypocrisy is the ultimate vulnerability. The system at once created this contradiction and is weakened by it.  What comes next need not rely on false promises but on actions rooted in reality."</p><p><a href="https://jacobin.com/2026/04/israel-right-exist-palestine-self-determination/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>jacobin.com/2026/04/israel-rig</span><span>ht-exist-palestine-self-determination/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Israel" rel="tag">#<span>Israel</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Zionism" rel="tag">#<span>Zionism</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/Palestine" rel="tag">#<span>Palestine</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/SelfDetermintation" rel="tag">#<span>SelfDetermintation</span></a> <a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/tags/InternationalLaw" rel="tag">#<span>InternationalLaw</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/3e85f714-4bbc-44a0-a092-1b9b9c4efdeb/the-united-nations-partition-plan-for-palestine-allocated-the-majority-of-the-land-to-a-jewish-state-even-though-jews-were-a-minority-of-the-population-and-owned-only-a-small-fraction-of-the-land.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:22:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/3e85f714-4bbc-44a0-a092-1b9b9c4efdeb.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:27:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine allocated the majority of the land to a Jewish state, even though Jews were a minority of the population and owned only a small fraction of the land. on Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:32:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[That is how you state events of 1948 and before. I would like to state them a bit differently.<br /><br />UNSCOP, the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, was created in May 1947. The Jews opted for separate states. The Arabs wanted none of this. There was an official boycott from the Arab side and in practice it was not as well represented as the Jewish side accordingly.<br /><br />From the Jewish side, the committee met people of all factions. Ben Gurion had to make some concessions to the Ultra Orthodox delegates in order to get the on board with the idea of a Jewish State. In the other side, the Arab Higher Committee kept its hard line.<br /><br />So UNSCOP suggested a middle ground: a federation of a Jewish State and an Arab State, where Jerusalem and Bethlehem remain in a neutral zone for now. There are generally more populated lands that are in the Arab part (indeed, a large part of the land given to the Jewish state is the Negev in the south, that was not densely populated).<br /><br />Jews may have not considered that plan as optimal, but decided to stick with what they could get from the UN. Arabs rejected it.<br /><br />And in the day following the vote in the UN, Arabs rejected it in actions: a civil war erupted. In that civil war, the Palestinian Arab side was not as well-prepared and not as united as the Palestinian Jewish side. There were several months of static local attacks and ambushes, until the Jewish side realized that going on like this may end a failure, so they started a series of attacks on April 1948 that ended with the Palestinian Arab mostly collapsing. At that point Palestinian Arab militias were mostly out of the picture.<br /><br />Eventually a Palestinian state was eventually declared, in Gaza, in October 1st 1948, but thwarted in practice by Egypt and Jordan.<br /><br />In 1948 Jews were roughly third of the population in the country. Nowadays Jews are roughly half of the population. I'm very suspicious of any suggestion for a plain single state. It is all to easy to make it go up in flame like in the end of November 1947.<br />]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://cohens.org.il/social/tzafrir/p/1775475158.553436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://cohens.org.il/social/tzafrir/p/1775475158.553436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tzafrir@cohens.org.il]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:32:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine allocated the majority of the land to a Jewish state, even though Jews were a minority of the population and owned only a small fraction of the land. on Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:26:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/remixtures%40tldr.nettime.org">@<span>remixtures</span></a></span> Therefore the answer is "No".</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/N0tSure/statuses/116357279714603397</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/N0tSure/statuses/116357279714603397</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[n0tsure@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:26:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>