<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don&#x27;t, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://mstdn.science/@moritz_negwer/117109678119759211" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>mstdn.science/@moritz_negwer/1</span><span>17109678119759211</span></a></p><p>"If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don't, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself. But if you think you know how science works when you actually don't, you're sunk—you literally can't do it if you think it's impossible." - Adam Mastroiani</p><p>Thank you for this brilliant article, <span><a href="/user/moritz_negwer%40mstdn.science">@<span>moritz_negwer</span></a></span> 🧡</p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/science" rel="tag">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/psychology" rel="tag">#<span>psychology</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/44e3238b-b5a6-4f18-8215-a273716fe677/if-you-think-you-know-how-a-toilet-works-when-you-actually-don-t-whatever-you-still-know-enough-to-go-2-without-embarrassing-yourself.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:22:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/44e3238b-b5a6-4f18-8215-a273716fe677.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:45:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don&#x27;t, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself. on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:06:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/moritz_negwer%40mstdn.science">@<span>moritz_negwer</span></a></span> Yeah, that's another banger - thanks again <img src="https://forum.fedi.dk/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f60a.png?v=7979fdcf9c7" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--blush" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="😊" alt="😊" /></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/117112647971673188</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/117112647971673188</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jwcph@helvede.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:06:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don&#x27;t, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself. on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:48:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/jwcph%40helvede.net">@<span>jwcph</span></a></span> haha, nice that is resonated with you. This is one of the blogs that I keep recommending to other people, there are many useful concepts in there. </p><p>Another favourite post is this one, about how science (and especially science funding) is best understood as a strong-link problem, when we are currently regulating it as a weak-link problem. <br /><a href="https://www.experimental-history.com/p/repost-science-is-a-strong-link-problem" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>experimental-history.com/p/rep</span><span>ost-science-is-a-strong-link-problem</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mstdn.science/users/moritz_negwer/statuses/117111632897862989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mstdn.science/users/moritz_negwer/statuses/117111632897862989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[moritz_negwer@mstdn.science]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:48:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>