<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why, oh why is everybody trying so fucking hard to make AI sound good!?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://newsie.social/@TheConversationUS/116327450768392971" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>newsie.social/@TheConversation</span><span>US/116327450768392971</span></a></p><p>Why, oh why is everybody trying so fucking hard to make AI sound good!? This is just slightly better statistical analysis - and yes, I know, I keep harping that AI = statistics, but that doesn't mean that we HAVE TO credit everything accomplished with the help of statistics &amp; analysis to the hype marketing term of "AI". </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/journalism" rel="tag">#<span>journalism</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/media" rel="tag">#<span>media</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/56d89b3b-1083-454c-9ddd-b7d3cfb8fb30/why-oh-why-is-everybody-trying-so-fucking-hard-to-make-ai-sound-good</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:41:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/56d89b3b-1083-454c-9ddd-b7d3cfb8fb30.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:10:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>