<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Good, but unnecessarily waffling.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/117388585742793244" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>mastodon.social/@arstechnica/1</span><span>17388585742793244</span></a></p><p>Good, but unnecessarily waffling. E.g. in Denmark surveillance cameras can only point at public areas by special permission &amp; must be legally registered &amp; that's when there's explicit reason for them - perv glasses are purely recreational &amp; shouldn't be allowed for unregistered ubiquitous surveillance in public spaces by random people or companies. </p><p>That means you can't run around permanently recording with your phone either. </p><p>Regulate principles, not technologies. </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/privacy" rel="tag">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" rel="tag">#<span>tech</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/61582cbd-f171-4fe9-af3f-ee56811333bf/good-but-unnecessarily-waffling.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 04:59:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/61582cbd-f171-4fe9-af3f-ee56811333bf.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:37:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>