<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s super-amazing science, but... could we just call it &quot;computer analysis&quot;?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://social.anoxinon.de/@ninawillburger/116829618467249578" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>social.anoxinon.de/@ninawillbu</span><span>rger/116829618467249578</span></a></p><p>It's super-amazing science, but... could we just call it "computer analysis"? </p><p>That is what it is, nothing more but also nothing less &amp; I think we're deep enough into the problems we've created by using anthropomorphizing terminology for what computers do to rethink our choices. </p><p>It's not "learning" or "training" or "intelligent" etc. - it's just statistical analysis. </p><p>Pleez. </p><p>Thank you. </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/ai" rel="tag">#<span>ai</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" rel="tag">#<span>tech</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/MachineLearning" rel="tag">#<span>MachineLearning</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/science" rel="tag">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/archaeology" rel="tag">#<span>archaeology</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/655b34c2-1f27-4fe5-bf6b-ec6a3f8d5292/it-s-super-amazing-science-but...-could-we-just-call-it-computer-analysis</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:25:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/655b34c2-1f27-4fe5-bf6b-ec6a3f8d5292.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 05:04:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>