That's probably a misunderstanding.

You are being criticized for wanting more details, and as a result, they're suggesting you seek professional help. From an "AI"

https://sjtucker.bandcamp.com/track/not-the-villain

(Or, put another way, set up a standard that's very hard to achieve, let people get close, then yoink the goalpoasts on them. You want supervillains? That's how you get supervillains.)

The whole "AI-assisted" nonsense in scientific journals speaks to the divide between scientists and the corporate interests in for-profit journals that have their own incentives.

#ScientificPublishing

@afewbugs

Next up, Safety Data Sheets!

*sobs* in science.

The general public see that a supervillian is "Dr Something" ... they nod along sagely and say: Yes, they must be clever.

Those from academia nod along sagely and say: Clearly it drove them insane.

https://urbandictionary.store/mug/custom?word=wankpuffin

And they understand the consequences of providing a substandard service.

When you really look at it, the only way to properly do sciencing is to go evil. And like with the space programme, there'll probably be all kinds of incidental breakthroughs to benefit humanity.

Win-win if you ask me.

Yes, but wouldn't your evil superlab still be supplied by these calamities? Or are there specialist supervillain suppliers who understand just how important are super laser components?

I can feel your pain. In one of the areas I work in (space engineering) it wasn't at all enough that a thing worked and didn't die under freezing cold or radiation or whatever. It was the certified description of processes and materials for a thing that was essential to be able to use it. It also pushed the price by x10 or much more. No certificate, no use.