<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Last week, the Trump administration explicitly stated its intention to &quot;neutralize&quot; - its word, not mine - US trans people.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Trump administration explicitly stated its intention to "neutralize" - its word, not mine - US trans people.</p><p>Since then I can count on one hand the number of cis people who have even mentioned it. A whole bunch of cis people have talked about trans people demanding too much though.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/863158fb-bed2-41eb-aa7f-562cf93c7d40/last-week-the-trump-administration-explicitly-stated-its-intention-to-neutralize-its-word-not-mine-us-trans-people.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:18:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/863158fb-bed2-41eb-aa7f-562cf93c7d40.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:03:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Last week, the Trump administration explicitly stated its intention to &quot;neutralize&quot; - its word, not mine - US trans people. on Tue, 12 May 2026 14:10:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/theleftistlawyer%40mastodon.social">@<span>theleftistlawyer</span></a></span> </p><p>as a lawyer, surely you know the importance of correct citations</p><p>so where is the citation for this claim you assert ?</p><p>this seems to be a reliable source<br /><a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/being-pro-transgender-now-makes-152804557.html" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>yahoo.com/news/articles/being-</span><span>pro-transgender-now-makes-152804557.html</span></a></p><p>the relevant paragraph is, like most stuff from Trump, poorly written, so it isn't exactly clear what they intend<br />but neutralize seems a fair read</p><p>But<br />but<br />notice the word "violent'</p><p>right lawyer ??</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mas.to/users/failedLyndonLaRouchite/statuses/116562004689774438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mas.to/users/failedLyndonLaRouchite/statuses/116562004689774438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:10:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Last week, the Trump administration explicitly stated its intention to &quot;neutralize&quot; - its word, not mine - US trans people. on Tue, 12 May 2026 14:07:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/theleftistlawyer%40mastodon.social">@<span>theleftistlawyer</span></a></span> the only way to neutralize trans people is to give them a house and free healthcare, and also stop raping them.</p><p>They can't even bribe the people with social democracy anymore smdh</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://todon.nl/users/burnoutqueen/statuses/116561993010945934</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://todon.nl/users/burnoutqueen/statuses/116561993010945934</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[burnoutqueen@todon.nl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:07:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>