<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Also, we&#x27;re not &quot;anxious&quot; about this technology - we reject it on account of the myriad of very well-documented harms incurred by it; socially, societally, educationally, professionally, environmentally, economically...]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://kolektiva.social/@danmcquillan/116759357841899313" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>kolektiva.social/@danmcquillan</span><span>/116759357841899313</span></a></p><p>Also, we're not "anxious" about this technology - we reject it on account of the myriad of very well-documented harms incurred by it; socially, societally, educationally, professionally, environmentally, economically... </p><p>That's not "anxiety". It's called "reacting proportionately &amp; thoughtfully to the information at hand". </p><p>I can see where modern so-called journalists get confused. </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/media" rel="tag">#<span>media</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/press" rel="tag">#<span>press</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/journalism" rel="tag">#<span>journalism</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" rel="tag">#<span>tech</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/8f302d8e-dfa9-4367-b051-c7397b9f51f2/also-we-re-not-anxious-about-this-technology-we-reject-it-on-account-of-the-myriad-of-very-well-documented-harms-incurred-by-it-socially-societally-educationally-professionally-environmentally-economically...</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:52:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/8f302d8e-dfa9-4367-b051-c7397b9f51f2.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:36:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Also, we&#x27;re not &quot;anxious&quot; about this technology - we reject it on account of the myriad of very well-documented harms incurred by it; socially, societally, educationally, professionally, environmentally, economically... on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:31:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/ij%40cupoftea.social">@<span>ij</span></a></span> There should be a link <img src="https://forum.fedi.dk/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f601.png?v=7979fdcf9c7" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--grin" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="😁" alt="😁" /></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/116763572149116972</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/jwcph/statuses/116763572149116972</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jwcph@helvede.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:31:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Also, we&#x27;re not &quot;anxious&quot; about this technology - we reject it on account of the myriad of very well-documented harms incurred by it; socially, societally, educationally, professionally, environmentally, economically... on Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:47:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/jwcph%40helvede.net">@<span>jwcph</span></a></span> Is it populism? In between enthusiastic users and AI investors, it feels a lot like a minority position to be critical towards AI. Also, the concept of populism is only relevant if there is anything to gain politically from rallying masses against AI. I don't see this, I only see concerned activists, researchers and the like.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/tokeriis/statuses/116760331988362495</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://helvede.net/users/tokeriis/statuses/116760331988362495</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tokeriis@helvede.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:47:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Also, we&#x27;re not &quot;anxious&quot; about this technology - we reject it on account of the myriad of very well-documented harms incurred by it; socially, societally, educationally, professionally, environmentally, economically... on Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:44:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/jwcph%40helvede.net">@<span>jwcph</span></a></span> Also? Does this follow on from something? I cannot see what.</p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://cupoftea.social/ap/users/116726584663277995/statuses/116760318043722747</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://cupoftea.social/ap/users/116726584663277995/statuses/116760318043722747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ij@cupoftea.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:44:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>