<![CDATA[When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it.]]>When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it.

Instead, I ask the sender to summarize the novella in their own words, because I do not have the time, unless they explain to me why it‘s worthwhile.

My advice: do the same. Deflect, politely, LLM dumps. Let‘s make this a conversational norm.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/91d1904a-8453-489b-8f3e-dcac4ea6a7a3/when-i-get-a-report-which-is-obviously-llm-output-i-do-not-read-it.RSS for NodeSat, 06 Jun 2026 17:38:58 GMTSun, 31 May 2026 07:33:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 10:46:47 GMT]]>@icing ok now it's way more clear, I think I understand and agree 🙂 Thanks !

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://hostux.social/users/PorCus/statuses/116668786773207352https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://hostux.social/users/PorCus/statuses/116668786773207352Sun, 31 May 2026 10:46:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 10:24:44 GMT]]>@PorCus No. The prompt could be "Find a security vulnerability in ".

I'd want to know *what exactly* the submitted LLM output found and why it is a vulnerability (and not some bug).

In the reporters words. To make sure they read it. If they did not read/understand it, it is not a communication.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://chaos.social/users/icing/statuses/116668700045626149https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://chaos.social/users/icing/statuses/116668700045626149Sun, 31 May 2026 10:24:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 10:20:34 GMT]]>@icing so in other words ' please send me the prompt ' ? would that be acceptable ?

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://hostux.social/users/PorCus/statuses/116668683681144409https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://hostux.social/users/PorCus/statuses/116668683681144409Sun, 31 May 2026 10:20:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 09:32:45 GMT]]>@icing Yeah I do this too. Arguing with an LLM is pointless, and if the other person is unable to make their points themselves then they're not an actual participant in the discussion.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://swecyb.com/users/troed/statuses/116668495679155438https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://swecyb.com/users/troed/statuses/116668495679155438Sun, 31 May 2026 09:32:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 09:18:42 GMT]]>@icing
I replied: "I don't engage with AI slop, as I find it demeaning to both the sender and the recipient. After a brief investigation though, it appears that you signed up for a class but never attended, and since the class was not full, I'm happy to cancel any fees that were due. (You could have just asked for that in a two line email, and the result would have been the same.)"

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/timsk/statuses/116668440403014939https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/timsk/statuses/116668440403014939Sun, 31 May 2026 09:18:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 09:18:36 GMT]]>@icing in response to my automated message to a customer saying "you appear to owe some money, please settle up or get in touch if there's a problem", I got 8 pages of ChatGPT slop about how the debt doesn't exist, about legal precedents, threats of legal action for harassment, it went on and on.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/timsk/statuses/116668440023156761https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/timsk/statuses/116668440023156761Sun, 31 May 2026 09:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 08:53:15 GMT]]>@icing
But won’t they just respond with an LLM summary? I suppose that does cut down your time wasted. 🤷‍♂️

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/KimSJ/statuses/116668340331642576https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/KimSJ/statuses/116668340331642576Sun, 31 May 2026 08:53:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to When I get a report which is obviously LLM output, I do not read it. on Sun, 31 May 2026 08:14:45 GMT]]>@icing
Yes. If they can't be bothered to write it, why should you be bothered to read it.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodonapp.uk/users/tpuddle/statuses/116668188926215018https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodonapp.uk/users/tpuddle/statuses/116668188926215018Sun, 31 May 2026 08:14:45 GMT