<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A French study finds that voters reward climate goals and punish denial across party lines — but ambitious, concrete policies bring no average electoral gain and can backfire: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tandfonline.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1080&#x2F;01402382.2026.2674875]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A French study finds that voters reward climate goals and punish denial across party lines — but ambitious, concrete policies bring no average electoral gain and can backfire: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2026.2674875" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10</span><span>80/01402382.2026.2674875</span></a></p><p>Having followed Danish climate politics for some years this sounds right. In CONCITO we have also seen it play out in surveys, like:<br />'Should politicians do more to curb climate change?' [Yes!]<br />'Do you support a tax on red meat' [No!]</p><p>And so I had to make the below. </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.nu/tags/dkpol" rel="tag">#<span>dkpol</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.nu/tags/dkgreen" rel="tag">#<span>dkgreen</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/9b2621d3-4a7b-41c8-812e-d1adc05211f6/a-french-study-finds-that-voters-reward-climate-goals-and-punish-denial-across-party-lines-but-ambitious-concrete-policies-bring-no-average-electoral-gain-and-can-backfire-https-www.tandfonline.com-doi-full-10.1080-01402382.2026.2674875</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:42:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/9b2621d3-4a7b-41c8-812e-d1adc05211f6.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:45:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>