Euro. Crt. Human Rights can be ignored. But "stop transferring all personal data to UK now" can't!

Best of luck to the youngs & littles

I’m not a newspaper or an academic paper.

I am, in the end, writing to express myself in the hope (but never the expectation) that other people will enjoy reading it.

but IMO a blog post on a non fiction topic should have a lede paragraph that summarizes the argument and the reader should't have to wade thru all sorts of personal trivia

or a the very least you should have some sort of header or thing that allows the reader to skip to lede

May it be both not what you find useful or interesting and also, still, arguably written to reflect its author’s wishes and opinions?

the lede (below) appears after what, 20 paragraphs of irrelevant background crap and throat clearing ?

go read a Paul Krugman blog, word by fucking word, the learn how to write

and only after his classified work became public and after there trying to sell his suicide as an 'accident' failed badly.

fuck 'em

It is somehow fitting that the UK government would jeopardise their whole economy - because that is how significant the EU’s adequacy agreement is to them- because it really really wanted to mistreat trans people.

EU law includes the corpus of legal decisions from the CJEU, such as the VP case;

“it is for the controller, … to take into consideration that person’s gender identity at the time of their registration in the asylum register, and not the gender identity assigned to them at birth.”