From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear.

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:41:18 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:41:18 GMT

My next book is *The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI*, out next month. Pre-order it now, including as a DRM-free audiobook or ebook, at my Kickstarter, and help me continue to prove that DRM-free isn't just the *right* way to reach an audience, it's also the *best* way to reach them:

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/doctorow/the-reverse-centaurs-guide-to-life-after-ai

eof/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:57 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:57 GMT

People in my technopolitical faction have a saying of our own: "'Crypto' means *cryptography*." Cryptography plays a hugely important role in protecting people from crime and state repression. It is no substitute for the rule of law and democracy, but it remains a key tool for securing and defending both:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/27/the-best-defense-against-rubber-hose-cryptanalysis/

Cryptocurrency, on the other hand? That's the worst of all worlds.

29/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:46 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:46 GMT

Worse: as cryptocurrency lobbyists have fused crypto with the world's largest, most corrupt governments (especially the Trump regime), crypto now has the exposure to state coercion that made banks so unsuitable, but without the (inconstant, insufficient) protections offered by traditional banking.

And that's before we talk about the energy consumption problems, the scams enabled by crypto, and the rampant human trafficking that those scams necessitate:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-human-trafficking-victims-are-forced-to-run-pig-butchering-investment-scams

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:07 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:40:07 GMT

It's a good reminder of how badly crypto has failed on its own terms, delivering its biggest users into an existence of fear and physical peril that rivals the plight of even the most hunted dissidents in the most repressive societies.

27/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:54 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:54 GMT

Crypto true believers exhort one another to "HODL" (hold on for dear life). Selling your crypto during downturns is considered a moral failing. But now, crypto holders - especially those who manage their own keys - are *literally* holding on for dear life, as they are hunted by crime syndicates and state actors alike.

26/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:42 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:42 GMT

What kind of "liberty" requires you to spend $860,000 armoring your two top execs' personal vehicles to protect them from gunfire and light artillery?

https://www.ft.com/content/71d7486d-89b5-48ac-8f94-857578c0a03b

It costs $6.2m/year to protect Coinbase's CEO - "more than the combined amount that JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Nvidia Corp. spent on their respective CEOs":

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-18/crypto-high-rollers-go-big-on-bodyguards-to-deter-kidnappers

25/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:31 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:31 GMT

Rosenthal quotes Nicholas Weaver, who asks what kind of "internet of money" bitcoin can be if it can't be safely stored on a computer connected to the actual internet:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3208095

But an equally valid question is, what kind of escape from tyranny is it that requires you to hide your identity at all times lest you be snatched off the street and brutally tortured?

24/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:19 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:19 GMT

Rosenthal provides a litany of the escalating security measures crypto holders are turning to as this problem goes progressively more dangerous and terrifying. There's the guy who splits his keys up in four physical vaults at four separate locations, whose management is instructed to make him wait a minimum of seven days when he asks to retrieve them. Despite all this, he keeps his identity secret:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-19/crypto-conferences-up-security-after-attacks-scams

23/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:03 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:39:03 GMT

Combine the fact that permanent ledgers make it progressively easier to identify people whom you can torture into revealing their crypto keys with the irreversible, instantaneous nature of crypto transfers and you get some very juicy targets indeed. "Not your keys, not your wallet" means it's "not anyone else's problem" when you get robbed. You can't ask the bank to interdict or reverse the transaction.

22/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:53 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:53 GMT

For example, if the taxi company you use suffers a breach that reveals journeys associated with every doctor's appointment at the hospital, now an attacker can pick out the home or work address of the single person who visited the hospital just before you received your prescription. The longer an "anonymized" data-set sits around in public view, the easier it gets to de-anonymize it:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10933-3

21/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:44 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:44 GMT

You might be represented in a database of hospital prescribing activities by a random number, and that number might be hard to associate with your real identity...at first. But with every subsequent release of data - whether in the form of an anonymized data-set or a breach - it gets easier to cross-reference the facts associated with your record with other facts from other records, such that a detailed, identifying picture of you emerges one fact at a time.

20/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:29 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:29 GMT

For one thing, cryptocurrencies depend on "public ledgers" that indelibly, publicly record every transaction in the network. Cryptocurrency is nothing without these ledgers, and they *have* to be immutable and public to work. This is very bad news for anyone who relies on anonymity as their defense against physical attacks.

That's because "reidentification attacks" (where an anonymous person in a dataset is positively identified) get easier to perform over time.

19/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:04 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:38:04 GMT

That's precisely what's going on. People with substantial cryptocurrency holdings face grave personal danger, and the physical attacks on their person grow bolder, more violent, and more sadistic by the day:

https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks/blob/master/README.md

As crypto critic David Rosenthal writes, this problem is even worse than it seems at first blush:

https://blog.dshr.org/2026/05/wrench-attacks.html

18/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:53 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:53 GMT

That's where the wrench attacks come in. Because if you are in possession of keys that can be used to irreversibly and instantaneously steal large sums of money and move it to jurisdictions where the perpetrators are beyond any legal or physical recourse (e.g. North Korea), then there is a massive incentive for your adversaries to kidnap you and hit you with a wrench or a rubber hose.

17/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:42 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:42 GMT

For bitcoin maxis and other anti-state cypherpunks, this is just a skill issue. Anyone who doesn't understand how to manage their own keys and turns to a platform to hold and move their crypto is getting what they deserve. As the maxim goes, "Not your keys, not your wallet," which is cypherpunkspeak for "caveat emptor."

16/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:29 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:37:29 GMT

The upshot: cryptocurrency mostly replaces banks - imperfect, but heavily regulated and insured - with unregulated platforms with murky ownership and often defective procedures, who may or may not be insured (or even locatable) in the event of a collapse or a breach. Consequently, cryptocurrency has become a scam magnet of unprecedented and unstoppable power, and hardly a day goes by without people being ripped off in the most ghastly ways imaginable:

https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/

15/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:59 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:59 GMT

And when it comes to transactions, crypto proves to be unwieldy, expensive and complex, so that nearly all crypto users end up directing an intermediary (like Coinbase) to hold and move their cryptographic assets for them.

14/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:42 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:42 GMT

The number of people who understand contracts is small, the number of people who understand the software that embodies smart contracts is likewise small, and the Venn intersection of the two is more of a sphincter. What's more, there is irreducible ambiguity in all but the simplest of contracts, which means that even a "self-executing" contract ends up relying on a human adjudicator (an "oracle") who can be bribed or intimidated into cheating:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/14/externalities/#dshr

13/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:30 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:30 GMT

Rather than asking courts to interpret contracts, we can put our trust in self-executing "smart contracts," and rather than asking banks to safeguard our financial integrity, we can use cryptographic software to ensure that money only moves when the person it belongs to tells it to.

This has many problems. Smart contracts are slow, expensive, and unreliable.

12/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:17 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:17 GMT

Encryption isn't proof against rubber hoses, but it *is* effective against many other forms of state repression, and it can provide a *technical* edge for those engaged in a *political* struggle.

Another faction - the faction most associated with bitcoin and subsequent cryptocurrency projects - rejects the role of the state altogether, and seeks to replace states (and state-regulated institutions like courts and banks) with mathematics.

11/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:03 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:36:03 GMT

My technopolitics faction - the faction associated with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, where I've worked for a quarter-century - has an answer: the role of encryption is to provide a measure of privacy and security that is best used to organize *political* struggles to demand the rule of law and respect for human rights.

10/

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:39 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:39 GMT

But what do you do if you already live under tyranny? The rule of law is a great defense, but cryptography alone can't bring about the rule of law. What is the role of technology in this foundational struggle?

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:26 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:26 GMT

What's more, the most effective physical defenses we have come from a strong rule of law, because even the thickest safe door benefits from the threat of prison for anyone who breaks into the safe, and the most effective tool for preventing a cop from hitting you with a rubber hose is the existence of a judge who can send that cop to prison for abusing your civil rights.

Reply to From the earliest days of technopolitics, the role of technology in resisting authoritarianism was unclear. on Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:13 GMT

pluralistic@mamot.fr — Thu, 28 May 2026 11:35:13 GMT

Later, this became known as a "wrench attack" after a famous XKCD comic about $1m worth of security technology being defeated by hitting someone with a $5 wrench until they divulged the password:

https://xkcd.com/538/

Once you stipulate to the problem of wrench attacks and rubber-hose cryptanalysis, it becomes apparent that your cryptography is only as good as your physical defenses.