<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s easy to think this would be great; who doesn&#x27;t want total, searchable recall?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://mastodon.online/@pernillet/116882919287160947" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>mastodon.online/@pernillet/116</span><span>882919287160947</span></a></p><p>It's easy to think this would be great; who doesn't want total, searchable recall? </p><p>But the reality is, nobody does. If we had it but weren't pushed to use it, 99.99999etc. never would &amp; only a similarly miniscule fraction of the ones who did would actually get anything valuable out of it. </p><p>It simply isn't how a sapient awareness works. Even though it often doesn't feel that way, the embodied mind lives in the world, not in an inadequate summary of it. </p><p><a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" rel="tag">#<span>tech</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c40c87c6-97a1-4406-ba1d-c9f51f31bd21/it-s-easy-to-think-this-would-be-great-who-doesn-t-want-total-searchable-recall</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 05:57:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/c40c87c6-97a1-4406-ba1d-c9f51f31bd21.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 06:56:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>