<![CDATA[Are we having fun yet?]]>Are we having fun yet?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/topic/cf13bd79-d675-4957-9416-e9a1bdca47b3/are-we-having-fun-yetRSS for NodeWed, 08 Apr 2026 20:43:43 GMTTue, 31 Mar 2026 04:02:31 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Are we having fun yet? on Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:10:02 GMT]]>@sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange am I reading this correctly, that they need ~ 5×10⁹ gates in best case?

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://toot.pouyan.net/objects/6c47b520-6271-43e3-84de-6ca970481787https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://toot.pouyan.net/objects/6c47b520-6271-43e3-84de-6ca970481787Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:10:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Are we having fun yet? on Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:42:31 GMT]]>@sophieschmieg is it still "in 8 years we're gonna be able to break all encryption by quantum computers", like in the last 30 years, or is this a real danger? I mean are 10k reconfigurable atomic qubits happening now already? I am a layman, so apologies for an uneducated question.

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/ar1/statuses/116322189404071733https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://mastodon.social/users/ar1/statuses/116322189404071733Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:42:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Are we having fun yet? on Tue, 31 Mar 2026 04:06:31 GMT]]>Oh, and in case you weren't having enough fun, here are some updated resource estimates for running Shor's on elliptic curves, unfortunately weirdly focused on cryptocurrencies.

Fun fact: I almost found a soundness problem in that zero knowledge proof that was based on a quine. Unfortunately the circuit cannot produce quines.

https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/

]]>https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/sophieschmieg/statuses/116321811899644752https://forum.fedi.dk/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/sophieschmieg/statuses/116321811899644752Tue, 31 Mar 2026 04:06:31 GMT