It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:04:26 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:04:26 GMT

@Robinzz3 That's a valuable and important perspective, and I certainly can't speak to your experiences. However, would you agree that your careful, intentional use is uncommon? And if so, is the deluge of language generated without that care is deeply corrosive?

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:55:50 GMT

d1@autistics.life — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:55:50 GMT

@mttaggart I see it as pretty much the end of meaning-making which is done as a group exercise, and has a felt sense of connection, common purpose and fit to reality

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:03:24 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 03:03:24 GMT

@tehfishman Thank you! I really appreciate it.

And yes, I agree. Survival requires community and, like, access to medicine.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:56:31 GMT

tehfishman@ioc.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:56:31 GMT

@mttaggart I didn't reply at the time because I was high as shit and have a personal rule about not engaging with anyone on the internet while not sober; I read your poem about grace as I was starting a camping trip. First of all, I've since re-read it while sober so I can earnestly say I really like it. It has been on my mind since I read it.
Second of all, the forest hideout, while extremely tempting, is probably insufficient.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:47:29 GMT

r343l@freeradical.zone — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:47:29 GMT

@mttaggart @glyph Yeah. Our ability to communicate is so much tied into our ability to imagine a mind that works like ours creating the words. When I’m reading LLM generated stuff and I realize that wait this is nonsense because this wasn’t written (or even revised) by a person it’s so painful. Because I spent so much energy assuming it is.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:47:24 GMT

dpnash@c.im — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:47:24 GMT

@mttaggart

Concrete example: “Claudish”.

That’s what some developers who use Claude Code and related tools call the weird text blobs it spits out when “explaining” what it does.

In my opinion, it’s even worse than the well-known ChatGPT verbal tics like “It’s not X; it’s Y” and overusing Rule of Three. Imagine taking the worst trends in both software developer jargon and corporate marketing language, inducing some model collapse so the vocabulary and grammar feel artificially restrictive and reductive, and finally wrapping it all up in a punchy, terse style that is neither clear nor pleasant to read.

Claudish has been around for a while (I’ve seen it creep into various documents at work over the last 6 months or so), but has finally reached a point where even hardcore Claude fans are noticing and getting irritated. https://slhck.info/software/2026/06/22/claudish.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:46:17 GMT

glyph@mastodon.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:46:17 GMT

@mttaggart @r343l even the imperfections can be extremely revealing! but with an LLM there is no revealing because there is nothing *to* reveal

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:44:56 GMT

glyph@mastodon.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:44:56 GMT

@mttaggart @tehfishman while to some extent I empathize, also, sometimes a thing is just very different from another thing, despite superficial similarities.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:43:44 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:43:44 GMT

@r343l @glyph Language is of course an imperfect transmission mechanism in the best of circumstances. But underlying the whole of our written culture is the conceit that a mind somewhere is trying to convey meaning and thought. This conceit is what LLMs erode.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:40:34 GMT

r343l@freeradical.zone — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:40:34 GMT

@glyph @mttaggart It can feel bad and it’s hard and sometimes what you end up with doesn’t effectively communicate our thoughts to others whose language, experience and cultural context is just enough off from our own that our intent is not accurately (enough) reflected into their mind. It’s quite amazing what machine learning can do with human language, but it also is missing so much of what is going on because we often don’t know what is missing with our words until they fail.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:35:44 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:35:44 GMT

@tehfishman Same boat. Forest hideout seems better every day.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:34:07 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:34:07 GMT

@glyph With whom does the user converse in a prompt? What do they receive back? How can it be anything nourishing? And over time, what happens to the mind that speaks mostly to the thoughtless machine?

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:32:39 GMT

tehfishman@ioc.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:32:39 GMT

@mttaggart I used to look at parents afraid of navigating technological advancement as being silly. And now I am a parent afraid of my child navigating technological advancement.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:29:41 GMT

glyph@mastodon.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:29:41 GMT

@mttaggart it is hard to talk about because the origin point for all their usage is still “language”. they write so many prompts. so many agents dot em dee. but it is … debased, somehow. the kind of thinking that goes into a prompt is distorted and bizarre. flaccid, careless, the perverse approximation of language that you get out of a chatbot is a strangely fitting reward for the perverse approximation of language you put in

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:26:44 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:26:44 GMT

@tehfishman I used to use it as a counter to parents who were terrified of the internet. Joke's on me.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:25:59 GMT

tehfishman@ioc.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:25:59 GMT

@mttaggart Reading this is an absolute trip in the modern context

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:25:36 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:25:36 GMT

@glyph Yeah for me "language" is broadly "the ordering of human thought into speech or writing" in all forms.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:24:29 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:24:29 GMT

@brass75 @astraluma I actually don't think it is the smallest part. By severing constructed language that appears human from human intent, and flooding our world with that intentless language, erodes the fabric of meaning that binds us

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:19:27 GMT

glyph@mastodon.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:19:27 GMT

@mttaggart “I must be moving these weights wrong, every time I go to the gym my arms hurt”

not a perfect metaphor since not all of what hurts here is just self-improvement, the ordering of the ideas also improves the ideas themselves, but, still, same vibes

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:19:26 GMT

glyph@mastodon.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:19:26 GMT

@mttaggart not just language but writing and editing specifically. there is a comprehensive misunderstanding of what the process of writing *is*. “this is uncomfortable and I am not quickly getting to the result (e.g.: a word count); I must be doing this wrong”. no! the discomfort is the point. and not like in a “suffering is valorous” way but in a “resolving cognitive dissonance is painful” way. you’re ordering your own disordered thoughts! that is hard and it feels bad

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:18:06 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:18:06 GMT

@cR0w I actually don't think any amount of semiotics or epistemology would prevent or undo the craven nature of these people. But yes, perhaps the metaphysical danger would be better understood.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:17:45 GMT

eestileib@tech.lgbt — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:17:45 GMT

@cR0w @mttaggart

Not even humanities nuance, just any humanities at all that they took seriously and appreciated.

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:16:24 GMT

mttaggart@infosec.exchange — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:16:24 GMT

@tehfishman It's in Phaedrus:

https://www.antiquitatem.com/en/origin-of-writing-memory-plato-phaedrus/

Reply to It seems to me that those who can't see the fundamentally destructive nature of LLMs never fully grasped the miracle that is language in the first place. on Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:15:30 GMT

brass75@twit.social — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:15:30 GMT

@mttaggart @astraluma Part (the smallest part, TBH) of the damage that LLMs do to society is devalue the word. Words matter. And just because 2 things are semantically equivalent does not mean that they are equal - but LLMs act as they are.