There are two ways that servers on here can accept new members:
-
@FediTips I recently joined, and avoided servers that required approval. I think the reasons were, in order of priority:
- I am used to the general internet where such a process would probably involve disclosure of sensitive data
- I dread having to justify myself and my views to another, particularly a stranger who's views I know nothing about
- I did not have to wait a long time to get accessIf it was clear that all that was expect was the content of my prospective welcome message, mostly to check I am not a bot, and it is usually quick to get approved then I would have been much more likely to consider those servers.
Okay, thank you so much for that!
So a customised question that made those points clear would make joining easier?
About the waiting time, is the main problem the actual time itself or not knowing how long it was? For example if it said "Most applications approved within 24 hours" would that help?
-
@linkplay @FediTips Spammers will just use AI anyway. It's genuine users who will be deterred.
The kind of malicious trolls I think we're talking about may have used open instances to reduce friction by one step, but I think it's a mistake to think they will just give up and go away if they have to type text in a box. I really think it's the wrong solution to the problem and that other measures like not allowing users to interact so freely immediately after registration would be more effective.
-
I can see that in theory, but in practice the question seems to be genuinely enough friction to put spammers off?
I don't know any accounts in the recent spam attacks that were on servers with non-instant signups.
@FediTips You're not listening.
This is something people don't want and it isn't going to solve the problem.
It's just something one user has latched onto in posts that are popular because they speak out against abuse. Of course abuse is wrong and action is needed, but a knee jerk reaction with a "solution" that's trivially circumvented just makes people feel good about doing something when they haven't actually achieved anything. Genuine users will be discouraged and the abuse will continue.
-
@FediTips I would never join anything with restricted registration. I am never going to put myself under the potential disapproval of some arbitrary dictator. It raises the hackles. How dare you judge me?
This is the thing though, most of the time the moderators aren't really bothered about what people actually write. I've joined servers where I just said "I am interested in (topic of server)" and it was quickly approved.
Would it help if the question made this clear?
The main reason a lot of servers have this question is just because it seems to work against spam attacks. All the spam attackers from the recent mass spam waves joined servers with instant signups.
-
There are two ways that servers on here can accept new members:
-Sign-ups where you join instantly
-Sign-ups where the server moderator has to manually approve your membership
Approval sign-ups make moderation much more effective, but some people seem to find them more difficult.
If you are someone who finds approval sign-ups more difficult, could you explain the main thing putting you off?
(By the way, this isn't meant to be judgmental, just want to find out what the main barriers are!
)@FediTips I just think we shouldn't build walled gardens. I had a bad experience with other platforms in the past where you have to "apply" to join, and those in charge found an opportunity to gatekeep.
There are some notable exceptions, but for the most part I won't join an online community where I have to "apply". That's how I ended up on the default server.
-
@FediTips You're not listening.
This is something people don't want and it isn't going to solve the problem.
It's just something one user has latched onto in posts that are popular because they speak out against abuse. Of course abuse is wrong and action is needed, but a knee jerk reaction with a "solution" that's trivially circumvented just makes people feel good about doing something when they haven't actually achieved anything. Genuine users will be discouraged and the abuse will continue.
A couple of things have happened in the recent spam attacks:
-The spammers are all on instant signup accounts.
-When servers which previously had spam signups switch off instant signups, they stop getting spam signups.
Given these two things, it's surely clear why admins use this tool?
I understand the concern about how it could be circumvented, but it doesn't seem actually to be happening?
-
@FediTips I just think we shouldn't build walled gardens. I had a bad experience with other platforms in the past where you have to "apply" to join, and those in charge found an opportunity to gatekeep.
There are some notable exceptions, but for the most part I won't join an online community where I have to "apply". That's how I ended up on the default server.
This is the thing though, most of the time mods aren't actually trying to screen the kind of person who joins, they just want to put spammers off joining. (Spam attacks recently have all come from instant signup servers.)
If the question about why you want to join made this clear, would it help?
For example when I've joined a server and written "I am interesting in (topic of server)" that has been enough and I got approved quickly.
-
Just going by recent experience, all of the recent spam/scam attacks were on servers with instant sign-ups. When servers switched to screened sign-ups, the spammers avoided signing up there.
That seems to be the number one reason why so many servers currently use this feature, it seems to work in the real world.
@FediTips @tokyo_0 @TroikaFox
Hey thanks for asking these questions and gathering feedback. I'd just like to humbly try and make sure we're not operating on a bad assumption here -When servers added moderated signups, the spammers stopped signing up on those servers - that is clear. However, if ALL servers moderated signups, would the spammers give up? Or would they adapt to the moderated signups (say, with an AI LLM) and continue spamming?
It is possible that they only stopped signing up on servers that added signup moderation because other open-signup servers were easily available. If that were no longer true, and if the spammers adapted and continued to sign up, then requiring moderated signups adds a barrier only for non-spammers, which seems counterproductive.
-
@FediTips @tokyo_0 @TroikaFox
Hey thanks for asking these questions and gathering feedback. I'd just like to humbly try and make sure we're not operating on a bad assumption here -When servers added moderated signups, the spammers stopped signing up on those servers - that is clear. However, if ALL servers moderated signups, would the spammers give up? Or would they adapt to the moderated signups (say, with an AI LLM) and continue spamming?
It is possible that they only stopped signing up on servers that added signup moderation because other open-signup servers were easily available. If that were no longer true, and if the spammers adapted and continued to sign up, then requiring moderated signups adds a barrier only for non-spammers, which seems counterproductive.
-
Okay, thank you so much for that!
So a customised question that made those points clear would make joining easier?
About the waiting time, is the main problem the actual time itself or not knowing how long it was? For example if it said "Most applications approved within 24 hours" would that help?
@FediTips Being told up front what the purpose was and what is expected would make it much less daunting. I personally would really like to see a automatically calculated number, say "Mean approval time in last week = X hours" or something, because you would really know what to expect, but having some idea would be an improvement.
-
@FediTips @tokyo_0 @TroikaFox
Hey thanks for asking these questions and gathering feedback. I'd just like to humbly try and make sure we're not operating on a bad assumption here -When servers added moderated signups, the spammers stopped signing up on those servers - that is clear. However, if ALL servers moderated signups, would the spammers give up? Or would they adapt to the moderated signups (say, with an AI LLM) and continue spamming?
It is possible that they only stopped signing up on servers that added signup moderation because other open-signup servers were easily available. If that were no longer true, and if the spammers adapted and continued to sign up, then requiring moderated signups adds a barrier only for non-spammers, which seems counterproductive.
"Or would they adapt to the moderated signups (say, with an AI LLM) and continue spamming?"
We don't know, but so far they haven't. Manual approval is seen as effective because it currently is.
Also, apart from the spam, there has also been the problem of people signing up with hateful racist usernames etc, which was prevented on servers that require manual approval but hasn't been caught by servers with instant sign-ups.
-
@FediTips Being told up front what the purpose was and what is expected would make it much less daunting. I personally would really like to see a automatically calculated number, say "Mean approval time in last week = X hours" or something, because you would really know what to expect, but having some idea would be an improvement.
Really great suggestion
-
I think we are talking at cross purposes here?
The idea of this thread wasn't about the general topic of fighting spammers, I'm mainly asking how to make moderated signups less daunting.
Moderated signups aren't just about spam, there are also things like the hateful usernames which appeared recently. There is no way to circumvent this with AI, a hateful username will be immediately obvious to a moderator and can't be changed later.
-
There are two ways that servers on here can accept new members:
-Sign-ups where you join instantly
-Sign-ups where the server moderator has to manually approve your membership
Approval sign-ups make moderation much more effective, but some people seem to find them more difficult.
If you are someone who finds approval sign-ups more difficult, could you explain the main thing putting you off?
(By the way, this isn't meant to be judgmental, just want to find out what the main barriers are!
)I don't like feeling like it's a gated community.
It gives me gross.
I completely understand kicking out spambots and bad actors, but I want to be able to look around and explore right away. Not wait and see if I get approved without any idea of how long it might take.
On the internet, even a day is too long and I'll go find something else.
There have been a number of platforms in the past where you couldn't join without an invite. No thanks. Exclusive clubs are not my jam.
-
I don't like feeling like it's a gated community.
It gives me gross.
I completely understand kicking out spambots and bad actors, but I want to be able to look around and explore right away. Not wait and see if I get approved without any idea of how long it might take.
On the internet, even a day is too long and I'll go find something else.
There have been a number of platforms in the past where you couldn't join without an invite. No thanks. Exclusive clubs are not my jam.
From the luddite normie perspective.
I feel like people are more discouraged by extra hoops than spammers.
Sure, spammers will take the path of least resistance, but why profile everyone when the bad actors are going to show you who they are anyway?I feel like it's behavior that needs to be monitored. Not access.
-
I don't like feeling like it's a gated community.
It gives me gross.
I completely understand kicking out spambots and bad actors, but I want to be able to look around and explore right away. Not wait and see if I get approved without any idea of how long it might take.
On the internet, even a day is too long and I'll go find something else.
There have been a number of platforms in the past where you couldn't join without an invite. No thanks. Exclusive clubs are not my jam.
Thanks for the feedback
This is why I'm asking, as most of the time the moderated signups are not meant to be about exclusivity or gated communities or similar. But they have no way to customise the question to make this clear
Would it help if the question was customised to make clear that they aren't trying to be exclusive, that they're just wanting to put off spammers etc?
And if they gave a rough idea of how quickly approvals happened?
-
There are two ways that servers on here can accept new members:
-Sign-ups where you join instantly
-Sign-ups where the server moderator has to manually approve your membership
Approval sign-ups make moderation much more effective, but some people seem to find them more difficult.
If you are someone who finds approval sign-ups more difficult, could you explain the main thing putting you off?
(By the way, this isn't meant to be judgmental, just want to find out what the main barriers are!
)@FediTips the approval process made me feel my profile and use was surveilled. I know it would be, possibly just as much, with a no-approval server, but having to write a note for someone to read about my inner-most thoughts made me feel very vulnerable and exposed
-
From the luddite normie perspective.
I feel like people are more discouraged by extra hoops than spammers.
Sure, spammers will take the path of least resistance, but why profile everyone when the bad actors are going to show you who they are anyway?I feel like it's behavior that needs to be monitored. Not access.
All that said, I have absolutely no problem doing some version of the "I am not a robot" routine.
-
From the luddite normie perspective.
I feel like people are more discouraged by extra hoops than spammers.
Sure, spammers will take the path of least resistance, but why profile everyone when the bad actors are going to show you who they are anyway?I feel like it's behavior that needs to be monitored. Not access.
The reason there's such a controversy and discussion about instant signups is beacuse the spammers and trolls aren't just causing problems on their own server.
For example a few days ago there were trolls signing up with extremely racist usernames. They couldn't do this on servers that have moderated signups because the mods would see it, but they were able to do this on servers with instant signups.
-
All that said, I have absolutely no problem doing some version of the "I am not a robot" routine.
So, if they could make clear that this is all they wanted, it would help?
