ActivityPub Protocol

@silverpill @protocol I read more about it and apparently it's never supposed to throw an error because it will just be assumed to be resolveable against the base vocabulary, so it some kind of problem but not a parsing one and can be ignored

Hi @skavish, do you know about FEP-171b: Conversation Containers?That FEP describes a similar mechanism, where audience is preserved throughout the thread, but Add activity is used instead of inbox forwarding. Conversation containers are used by Hubzilla and Streams (Friendica's successors).@protocol

@Claire, in Feb 2002, you created a topic where you mentioned soft deletes. While this isn't strictly related to Undo(Delete), this FEP recommends thinking of a received Delete as an instruction to invalidate the cache, and re-fetch, which would give you a better answer as to how to handle the received Delete or Undo(Delete).Perhaps this might help.