Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Fediverse
  3. It gets tiring to write Piefed/Lemmy/Mbin to call our part of the Fediverse, is Threadiverse now the accepted term?

It gets tiring to write Piefed/Lemmy/Mbin to call our part of the Fediverse, is Threadiverse now the accepted term?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Fediverse
fediverse
45 Indlæg 24 Posters 3 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • blaze@lemmy.zipB blaze@lemmy.zip

    It’s still the Fediverse. While things are connected, not everything has to be absolutely connected. There’s still work to be done.

    Except that’s the premise new joiners are told when they join the Fediverse “everything is connected”.

    Turns out it’s not, you have Mbin/PieFed/Lemmy on one side, then Mastodon/Sharkey/Iceshrimp on another, and the support between both is rudimentary, as people commented below

    fitik@fedia.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
    fitik@fedia.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
    fitik@fedia.io
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #41

    and the support between both is rudimentary, as people commented below

    Not on Mbin at least… I follow plenty of people from Mastodon/Other services from this MBin account and interact with them time from time

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • flamekebab@piefed.socialF flamekebab@piefed.social

      So you didn’t mean to reply to me in the first place?

      blaze@lemmy.zipB This user is from outside of this forum
      blaze@lemmy.zipB This user is from outside of this forum
      blaze@lemmy.zip
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #42

      I did, I was making a comparison how comments words such as “meta” and “threads” shouldn’t be owned by corporations

      flamekebab@piefed.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • blaze@lemmy.zipB blaze@lemmy.zip

        I did, I was making a comparison how comments words such as “meta” and “threads” shouldn’t be owned by corporations

        flamekebab@piefed.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        flamekebab@piefed.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        flamekebab@piefed.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #43

        Whilst I agree that they shouldn’t, it’s a fact that Threads exists and, as far as I know, is not part of the Threadiverse but is in an adjacent space. To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the “Threadiverse”. Mastodon does, for example.

        If we were talking about a family of phones called “Threads” then that wouldn’t be all that confusing, but when it’s another social app then it’s a mess.

        julian@activitypub.spaceJ P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • flamekebab@piefed.socialF flamekebab@piefed.social

          Whilst I agree that they shouldn’t, it’s a fact that Threads exists and, as far as I know, is not part of the Threadiverse but is in an adjacent space. To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the “Threadiverse”. Mastodon does, for example.

          If we were talking about a family of phones called “Threads” then that wouldn’t be all that confusing, but when it’s another social app then it’s a mess.

          julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
          julian@activitypub.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #44

          Is Zuck still using the term Threadiverse? If it was a one-off, then I’d write it off and take back the darn term.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • flamekebab@piefed.socialF flamekebab@piefed.social

            Whilst I agree that they shouldn’t, it’s a fact that Threads exists and, as far as I know, is not part of the Threadiverse but is in an adjacent space. To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the “Threadiverse”. Mastodon does, for example.

            If we were talking about a family of phones called “Threads” then that wouldn’t be all that confusing, but when it’s another social app then it’s a mess.

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            pamasich@kbin.earth
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #45

            To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the “Threadiverse”. Mastodon does, for example.

            If you count Mastodon, then Threads does indeed communicate with the Threadiverse. Here on Mbin, I can find federated accounts from there, like this totally random guy which do have actual posts. So looks like everything is federating over well.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Svar
            • Svar som emne
            Login for at svare
            • Ældste til nyeste
            • Nyeste til ældste
            • Most Votes


            • Log ind

            • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            Graciously hosted by data.coop
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Hjem
            • Seneste
            • Etiketter
            • Populære
            • Verden
            • Bruger
            • Grupper