Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. ActivityPub
  3. Fedicon Livestream

Fedicon Livestream

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet ActivityPub
fediconfedicon2025
81 Indlæg 29 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • chigaze@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chigaze@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chigaze@mstdn.ca
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #64

    @julian I have that mug!

    @chad @evan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • johnefrancis@cosocial.caJ johnefrancis@cosocial.ca

      @julian @chad @evan I have 2 of those! ,😃

      johnefrancis@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnefrancis@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnefrancis@cosocial.ca
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #65

      @julian @chad @evan

      chad@mstdn.caC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johnefrancis@cosocial.caJ johnefrancis@cosocial.ca

        @julian @chad @evan

        chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        chad@mstdn.ca
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #66

        @johnefrancis @julian @evan what a damn good looking mug!!

        I think the “Moosetodon Movement” means more than just mstdn.ca, further solidified at #FediCon; a movement country wide to kick the Zuckerverse to the curb.

        We still have a lot of work to do but I believe our small but mighty community is working toward that common goal.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
          gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
          gregalotl@c.im
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #67

          @julian
          TLDR; but if it's akin to a viable microparyment service, then let's use it to pay rights holders for their IP. It could be commission-free small amounts that are still greater than the royalties proprietary incumbents pay and could attract a critical mass through a/ better pay & b/ ethical tech.
          @reiver

          benpate@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johannab@cosocial.ca
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #68

            @julian

            I forget who caught me in the after party chaos and so wisely noted that Social Media != Social Network and among my FediUrbanism 2.0 revisions needs to be the idea that an online Social Network can possibly come closest to a true Third Space, but Social Media contains too many antithetical attributes.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • strypey@socialhub.activitypub.rocksS This user is from outside of this forum
              strypey@socialhub.activitypub.rocksS This user is from outside of this forum
              strypey@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #69
              julian:

              I'd love to put some of my creative and cat-herding energies toward developing an implementor-first place for AP developer support

              Come help us with the reboot of SocialHub, this is and has always been the vision. I'm 100% on board with making SH more fun! I am after all a member of fediverse.party, and the creator of the Freudian Typo of the Week : P. How about some new categories specifically for new implementers to compare notes, or for things like novelty implementations? We're totally open to ideas.

              johannab:

              Social Media != Social Network

              It's hard to know what to make of this in the absence of definitions of each. From context, I'm guessing that for you Social Media = Datafarming corporate platforms, yes? How would you define Social Networks?

              I tend to use both terms in their original usages (circa early 2000s). Where "social media" is open publishing with comments (blogging, vlogging, code forges with built-in bug tracking etc), so anyone can publish media and get rapid feedback. While "social network" covers any tool that enables regular interactions between people who know each other, 1:1 or in bounded groups (email, IM, group chat, web forums, link-sharing, etc).

              By those definitions the current fediverse is a mixture of both. It's heavily weighted towards social media, but there's a lot of work being done to extend AP (in FRPs and SocialCG taskforces and elsewhere) so it can offer more social networking features.

              To be clear, we don't disagree here, I'm just slicing the onion on a different angle

              aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • strypey@socialhub.activitypub.rocksS strypey@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                julian:

                I'd love to put some of my creative and cat-herding energies toward developing an implementor-first place for AP developer support

                Come help us with the reboot of SocialHub, this is and has always been the vision. I'm 100% on board with making SH more fun! I am after all a member of fediverse.party, and the creator of the Freudian Typo of the Week : P. How about some new categories specifically for new implementers to compare notes, or for things like novelty implementations? We're totally open to ideas.

                johannab:

                Social Media != Social Network

                It's hard to know what to make of this in the absence of definitions of each. From context, I'm guessing that for you Social Media = Datafarming corporate platforms, yes? How would you define Social Networks?

                I tend to use both terms in their original usages (circa early 2000s). Where "social media" is open publishing with comments (blogging, vlogging, code forges with built-in bug tracking etc), so anyone can publish media and get rapid feedback. While "social network" covers any tool that enables regular interactions between people who know each other, 1:1 or in bounded groups (email, IM, group chat, web forums, link-sharing, etc).

                By those definitions the current fediverse is a mixture of both. It's heavily weighted towards social media, but there's a lot of work being done to extend AP (in FRPs and SocialCG taskforces and elsewhere) so it can offer more social networking features.

                To be clear, we don't disagree here, I'm just slicing the onion on a different angle

                aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #70
                strypey:

                It’s hard to know what to make of this in the absence of definitions of each.

                I recentely tooted my definitions. Maybe they are useful to others:

                My definition of social networking is: Any direct and indirect human interaction between people.

                Social media then is a particular set of social networking use cases where people publish content to other people to interact with in a variety of ways.

                In any case social media are but a small subset of social networking against these definitions.

                jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quillmatiq@mastodon.socialQ quillmatiq@mastodon.social

                  @julian @benpate Iconic

                  benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  benpate@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #71

                  @quillmatiq @julian

                  ... and unplanned 😅

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                    @julian
                    TLDR; but if it's akin to a viable microparyment service, then let's use it to pay rights holders for their IP. It could be commission-free small amounts that are still greater than the royalties proprietary incumbents pay and could attract a critical mass through a/ better pay & b/ ethical tech.
                    @reiver

                    benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benpate@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #72

                    @gregalotl @julian @reiver

                    Yes 💯

                    On the Fediverse, the hard part is connecting the payment to the payment to the IP that you're purchasing. It means adding in a whole layer of identity and permissions that probably don't exist on most servers.

                    I believe sub.club managed this with a private "invite only" Mastodon feed, but we can go more granular than that.

                    I have a prototype working with #Emissary and Bandwagon.fm, and we'll need this tech on many more platforms to make a real difference.

                    gregalotl@c.imG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • econads@mendeddrum.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                      econads@mendeddrum.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                      econads@mendeddrum.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #73

                      @julian @dawn @coop I'm fully sighted, and I could do with some alt text for those tiny slides xD

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                        strypey:

                        It’s hard to know what to make of this in the absence of definitions of each.

                        I recentely tooted my definitions. Maybe they are useful to others:

                        My definition of social networking is: Any direct and indirect human interaction between people.

                        Social media then is a particular set of social networking use cases where people publish content to other people to interact with in a variety of ways.

                        In any case social media are but a small subset of social networking against these definitions.

                        jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #74

                        Interesting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media. The definition of a social network site that's usually referenced is from danah boyd and Nicole Ellison's 2007 paper on Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship:

                        We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site.

                        By this definition, email, blogs without blogrolls, Signal (where I can't view or traverse others lists of connections) are all examples of social media, but not social network sites.

                        boyd and ellison also talk about the rise of social network sites, including noting that several well-known examples started as non-networked social media:

                        From 2003 onward, many new SNSs were launched, prompting social software analyst Clay Shirky (2003) to coin the term YASNS: "Yet Another Social Networking Service." Most took the form of profile-centric sites, trying to replicate the early success of Friendster or target specific demographics.... Furthermore, as the social media and user-generated content phenomena grew, websites focused on media sharing began implementing SNS features and becoming SNSs themselves. Examples include Flickr (photo sharing), Last.FM (music listening habits), and YouTube (video sharing).

                        aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocks

                          Interesting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media. The definition of a social network site that's usually referenced is from danah boyd and Nicole Ellison's 2007 paper on Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship:

                          We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site.

                          By this definition, email, blogs without blogrolls, Signal (where I can't view or traverse others lists of connections) are all examples of social media, but not social network sites.

                          boyd and ellison also talk about the rise of social network sites, including noting that several well-known examples started as non-networked social media:

                          From 2003 onward, many new SNSs were launched, prompting social software analyst Clay Shirky (2003) to coin the term YASNS: "Yet Another Social Networking Service." Most took the form of profile-centric sites, trying to replicate the early success of Friendster or target specific demographics.... Furthermore, as the social media and user-generated content phenomena grew, websites focused on media sharing began implementing SNS features and becoming SNSs themselves. Examples include Flickr (photo sharing), Last.FM (music listening habits), and YouTube (video sharing).

                          aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #75
                          jdp23:

                          Interesting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media.

                          I am using these definitions in the context of social experience design, which starts looking at social networking solutions at a personal perspective. Here a person's 'social experience' starts conceptually when they wake up in the morning and social activities start to stream into their senses. I.e. it starts in the real world, offline, where technology fulfills only a supportive role in connecting people and social interactions.

                          jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocksA aschrijver@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                            jdp23:

                            Interesting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media.

                            I am using these definitions in the context of social experience design, which starts looking at social networking solutions at a personal perspective. Here a person's 'social experience' starts conceptually when they wake up in the morning and social activities start to stream into their senses. I.e. it starts in the real world, offline, where technology fulfills only a supportive role in connecting people and social interactions.

                            jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #76

                            Fair enough. boyd and Ellison are specifically talking about social network sites, the technological artifacts. In practice people sometimes use the term "social network" to refer to the network of people (and sometimes organizations) and their collections, and sometimes to refer to the technological artifact.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • benpate@mastodon.socialB benpate@mastodon.social

                              @gregalotl @julian @reiver

                              Yes 💯

                              On the Fediverse, the hard part is connecting the payment to the payment to the IP that you're purchasing. It means adding in a whole layer of identity and permissions that probably don't exist on most servers.

                              I believe sub.club managed this with a private "invite only" Mastodon feed, but we can go more granular than that.

                              I have a prototype working with #Emissary and Bandwagon.fm, and we'll need this tech on many more platforms to make a real difference.

                              gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gregalotl@c.im
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #77

                              @benpate
                              In ancient times there was a technology that may have had some relevance. I think it was called blockchain or suchlike!? 😜
                              @julian @reiver

                              benpate@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                @benpate
                                In ancient times there was a technology that may have had some relevance. I think it was called blockchain or suchlike!? 😜
                                @julian @reiver

                                benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benpate@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benpate@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #78

                                Regardless of the payment method, it’s still extra work to figure out who has paid for which content, and most Fediverse servers don’t have this in place yet, so crypto wouldn’t solve that part of the puzzle.

                                Separate from that, I’m pretty down on crypto - specifically because it seems like an end run around having a well-regulated banking system.

                                But I’m willing to be open; is there a good reason to look into crypto payments BEFORE direct bank transfers?

                                @gregalotl @julian @reiver

                                mro@digitalcourage.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benpate@mastodon.socialB benpate@mastodon.social

                                  Regardless of the payment method, it’s still extra work to figure out who has paid for which content, and most Fediverse servers don’t have this in place yet, so crypto wouldn’t solve that part of the puzzle.

                                  Separate from that, I’m pretty down on crypto - specifically because it seems like an end run around having a well-regulated banking system.

                                  But I’m willing to be open; is there a good reason to look into crypto payments BEFORE direct bank transfers?

                                  @gregalotl @julian @reiver

                                  mro@digitalcourage.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mro@digitalcourage.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mro@digitalcourage.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #79

                                  Hi @benpate @gregalotl @julian @reiver,
                                  maybe #GNU_Taler can simplify transfers of assets, including fiat currencies. But isn't that orthogonal to messaging and #ActivityPub?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocksJ jdp23@socialhub.activitypub.rocks

                                    Interesting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media. The definition of a social network site that's usually referenced is from danah boyd and Nicole Ellison's 2007 paper on Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship:

                                    We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site.

                                    By this definition, email, blogs without blogrolls, Signal (where I can't view or traverse others lists of connections) are all examples of social media, but not social network sites.

                                    boyd and ellison also talk about the rise of social network sites, including noting that several well-known examples started as non-networked social media:

                                    From 2003 onward, many new SNSs were launched, prompting social software analyst Clay Shirky (2003) to coin the term YASNS: "Yet Another Social Networking Service." Most took the form of profile-centric sites, trying to replicate the early success of Friendster or target specific demographics.... Furthermore, as the social media and user-generated content phenomena grew, websites focused on media sharing began implementing SNS features and becoming SNSs themselves. Examples include Flickr (photo sharing), Last.FM (music listening habits), and YouTube (video sharing).

                                    kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kichae@wanderingadventure.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #80

                                    Jon P said in Fedicon Livestream:
                                    > nteresting. I usually see social networking defined as a subset of social media.

                                    Indeed. This is how it’s often used in the social sciences that study online activity. Social Networking Sites are sites like Facebook, that require account following, or even bidirectional follows, while “social media” is everything from BBSes to forums to blogs with comment sections to, well, Social Networking Sites.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper