I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
-
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
Spent time reading... precious?
-
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
@Em0nM4stodon hey here's a screen of an email thread with the message "thoughts?"
-
@Em0nM4stodon, how about people who write the first draft and use AI to edit it for grammar and flow? Is that also not worth reading? Just curious to know.
@rohitfarmer @Em0nM4stodon
I would rather not -
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
@Em0nM4stodon so agreed that this post made my Sunday.
-
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
@Em0nM4stodon from my experience, these people don't even expect anyone reads it. They certainly don't read anything. They only read AI summary. It's especially frustrated when you send them your own blog post with a deep dive, they claim to have read it and then pull out some random point you made in it, that AI somehow thought it's the most relevant thing in the text to single out.
-
@Em0nM4stodon from my experience, these people don't even expect anyone reads it. They certainly don't read anything. They only read AI summary. It's especially frustrated when you send them your own blog post with a deep dive, they claim to have read it and then pull out some random point you made in it, that AI somehow thought it's the most relevant thing in the text to single out.
@licho Indeed. I hate this so so much.
-
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
@Em0nM4stodon hey Em
to me it's super useful for summarizing long articles. Of course, I'd never use it for personal writing and that's what you hate most, right?I understand your hate versus your AI-slop-"colleagues"
-
I'm not going to waste my precious human time reading something that you didn't spend your precious human time writing.
I really don't care about the well-aligned randomly stolen words of a text-generating machine you are using for cheap marketing.
@Em0nM4stodon @catsalad Jeebus, I had to proof some slop our VP of Product generated from about fifteen point form notes. Two pages, repeating the same info three times, to be “easier” for sales engineers. The point form was better, and I could have made it “easier” in less time than ot took to review. Without burning infinity resources.
-
@Em0nM4stodon @catsalad Jeebus, I had to proof some slop our VP of Product generated from about fifteen point form notes. Two pages, repeating the same info three times, to be “easier” for sales engineers. The point form was better, and I could have made it “easier” in less time than ot took to review. Without burning infinity resources.
@Taffer @Em0nM4stodon @catsalad and could AI have made it "more easily"?
-
@Em0nM4stodon from my experience, these people don't even expect anyone reads it. They certainly don't read anything. They only read AI summary. It's especially frustrated when you send them your own blog post with a deep dive, they claim to have read it and then pull out some random point you made in it, that AI somehow thought it's the most relevant thing in the text to single out.
@licho @Em0nM4stodon or maybe a point you didn't make. Someone sent me the ai text about me that was generated from three or four things she knew about me (professionally--this was not a dating ap LOL). It was repetitive about the three things it knew, and then ran off and made stuff up. Let us all hate AI.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
