Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
19 Indlæg 13 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

    (I did ultimately decide "sand" was basically about particle size and not castles and kept it.)

    deivudesu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    deivudesu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    deivudesu@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @elizabethtasker “rock powder”? 😬

    patrickhadfield@mastodon.scotP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

      I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

      I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

      Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

      sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
      sometimehippy@mastodon.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @elizabethtasker Gunk, to me, implies sticky and moist, which I'd be surprised if the surface of Phobos was.

      elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS sometimehippy@mastodon.online

        @elizabethtasker Gunk, to me, implies sticky and moist, which I'd be surprised if the surface of Phobos was.

        elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
        elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
        elizabethtasker@mastodon.online
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @SometimeHippy Not serious 😂

        sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

          @SometimeHippy Not serious 😂

          sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          sometimehippy@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          sometimehippy@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @elizabethtasker I know 🤪

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

            (I did ultimately decide "sand" was basically about particle size and not castles and kept it.)

            emily_s@mastodon.me.ukE This user is from outside of this forum
            emily_s@mastodon.me.ukE This user is from outside of this forum
            emily_s@mastodon.me.uk
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @elizabethtasker ok, but can we make sand castles on other worlds more often please? The universe always needs more whimsy. 😄

            Yes yes, the sand won't be wet enough to hold together... blah ... maybe it'll be scientifically interesting how it falls and collapses as the bucket is lifted. Lets call it a construction experiment... with crenelations.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • deivudesu@mastodon.socialD deivudesu@mastodon.social

              @elizabethtasker “rock powder”? 😬

              patrickhadfield@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
              patrickhadfield@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
              patrickhadfield@mastodon.scot
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @deivudesu @elizabethtasker I was thinking "eroded rock" (but that might have too many associations), "crushed rock" - and wondered about "gravel" (but not if the particle size is particularly relevant).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

                I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

                I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

                Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

                uc@mastodon.scotU This user is from outside of this forum
                uc@mastodon.scotU This user is from outside of this forum
                uc@mastodon.scot
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @elizabethtasker

                Ant's boulders.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

                  I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

                  I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

                  Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

                  skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skjeggtroll@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @elizabethtasker There's "aggregate", although that's also pretty technical.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gorfram@beige.party
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @cafuego @elizabethtasker
                    ‘Tatolith

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

                      I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

                      I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

                      Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

                      gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gorfram@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gorfram@beige.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @elizabethtasker
                      Just think- we could say we’re collecting “earth” from Phobos. 😜

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • oliviavespera@spacey.spaceO oliviavespera@spacey.space

                        @elizabethtasker

                        I like regolith though, i think it should be normalised. Bring people to the stars.

                        fionacraig@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fionacraig@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fionacraig@mastodon.scot
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        @OliviaVespera @elizabethtasker Also a regolith fan, but would like to proffer sediment or exo-sediment as nice alternatives. It gives a sense of "this got here by being ground up from bigger things, but we're not sure how. Yet."

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

                          I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

                          I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

                          Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

                          simon_brooke@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                          simon_brooke@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                          simon_brooke@mastodon.scot
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #17

                          @elizabethtasker granules? rockettes?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • elizabethtasker@mastodon.onlineE elizabethtasker@mastodon.online

                            I thesaurus’d “sand” to find an alternative word for “regolith” which is more non-scientist friendly but less beachy-Earth-images than “sand”.

                            I have been offered “ashes”, “filth”, “grime”, “birdlime”, “gunk”, and “stickum” 🧐

                            Not sure what I expected, but we’re now collecting “gunk” from Phobos 😐

                            mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mike_malaska@deepspace.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #18

                            @elizabethtasker The wierdness of Titan challenged all these definitions. I use a combo of composition+size descriptor.

                            For example, "silicate sands" on Earth, but also "gypsum sands" (like White Sands, New Mexico).

                            On Titan, mostly "organic sands". But there are also rare patches of "water ice sands", too.

                            Size-sorting is done by wind (Earth, Mars, Titan) and liquid (water for Earth and Mars, methane-nitrogen for Titan).

                            But without sorting (impact stuff), maybe "rock particles" would work?

                            mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM mike_malaska@deepspace.social

                              @elizabethtasker The wierdness of Titan challenged all these definitions. I use a combo of composition+size descriptor.

                              For example, "silicate sands" on Earth, but also "gypsum sands" (like White Sands, New Mexico).

                              On Titan, mostly "organic sands". But there are also rare patches of "water ice sands", too.

                              Size-sorting is done by wind (Earth, Mars, Titan) and liquid (water for Earth and Mars, methane-nitrogen for Titan).

                              But without sorting (impact stuff), maybe "rock particles" would work?

                              mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mike_malaska@deepspace.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mike_malaska@deepspace.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #19

                              @elizabethtasker (whenever I hear the term "gunk" I always think of refractory highly colored organics you find on outer solar system comets and worlds: "Tholins" "tholin gunk" "organic gunk". I'm not sure how much there would be on Phobos, probably a little, but is it enough to make a big difference in properties?)

                              ((I've definitely been in meetings and conferences where "tholin gunk" + shrug of shoulders is because nobody knows what the actual chemical structures are.))

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper