One of my big pet peeves is when people say "people used to ..." and they describe something well-off or only wealthy people did in the past.
-
For example I recently encountered a rant about the terrible quality of Temu furniture.
"Furniture used to be a family heirloom... but now it's disposable" --this isn't a statment without merit, but low quality items that didn't last may not be documented because they didn't last.
The selection bias of it all annoys me a little.
2/2
@futurebird
Survivorship bias is definitely a factor in this perception.But there is a kernel of truth in that sturdy, solid wood furniture has become much more expensive (demand being higher and trees not more numerous).
The gap is filled with cheaper, less durable furniture. So what we mainly notice is the declining quality of what we can afford.
Another bias is that we expect to spend more on personal electronics, computers, and other things that didn't exist decades ago. A person in the 1920s expected to spend more of their income on clothes and furnishings than we do.
Does that make us richer or poorer?
-
100% We are currently saving up for a single Ikea cabinet for our kitchen. $400 is like a month of groceries.
-
@futurebird the old old old heirloom furniture my family DOES have from the working class end?
called a 5 plank bench. a very rough hewn wooden bench woodworkers can slap together on a job either to sit or lay tools on- whatev. my grandmother either found or made it, my dad still keeps it around as he was a woodworker himself
he grew up w her seating neighborhood kids at it for a meal and i grew up sitting on it w my cousins for meals when we visited
but its not "pretty" so unless youre woodworkers who find it charming, it wouldnt be passed down!!
pictured- not our bench but one like it. ours has quite a few more nicks, bumps and scratches from age
@hi_cial @futurebird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hands_(TV_series) You might be interested in this.
-
@hi_cial @futurebird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hands_(TV_series) You might be interested in this.
@hi_cial @futurebird https://www.castleleslie.com/home/historical-castle-ireland/ https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/colourful-collection-from-castle-leslie-1.299280 There is a story that discarded furniture thrown into a flooded summer house over decades paid for the renovation of a castle, don't know if it's true.
-
@ClimateJenny @futurebird you still can! have you ever taken a hacksaw to IKEA stuff?
@ehproque @ClimateJenny @futurebird
Actually, no. The dressers were cardboard. Ikea stuff is a hundred times better.
As a disabled person, I've held back tears hundreds of times over the furniture that hurts my hands horribly to use, knowing now I could've got Ikea for the same price. Each year, I can replace one or two things.
-
@temporal_spider @futurebird i wonder if our eating or moving habits have changed too - or the average quality of fibers in our clothing
like i'm actually pretty secure now but even now i look at some of the fancy stuff i could theoretically get and my brain just nopes out and i look for something thin and flimsy and cheap and most importantly **lightweight that i can move with one hand while i've got the vacuum in the other**... -
One of my big pet peeves is when people say "people used to ..." and they describe something well-off or only wealthy people did in the past. "but nowadays people just..." and they describe something poor and broke people do today.
We don't have as much documentation of how poor people lived in the past... so in a way we don't know how poor people lived as clearly.
1/
@futurebird
"where's the romance of travel" in first class, where it always has been -
For example I recently encountered a rant about the terrible quality of Temu furniture.
"Furniture used to be a family heirloom... but now it's disposable" --this isn't a statment without merit, but low quality items that didn't last may not be documented because they didn't last.
The selection bias of it all annoys me a little.
2/2
@futurebird All our heirlooms look a little bit like this
Edit: Dang it Suzanne, you got there before me. -
@stellarsarah @louisa_ @futurebird that’s a great point, basically they are PA, housekeeper and and events manager rolled into one but also ‘not working’ hmm
-
For example I recently encountered a rant about the terrible quality of Temu furniture.
"Furniture used to be a family heirloom... but now it's disposable" --this isn't a statment without merit, but low quality items that didn't last may not be documented because they didn't last.
The selection bias of it all annoys me a little.
2/2
@futurebird I read Lark Rise to Candleford last year and even back in the 19th century there was talk about how shoddy all the new furniture was compared to the good old stuff.
-
For example I recently encountered a rant about the terrible quality of Temu furniture.
"Furniture used to be a family heirloom... but now it's disposable" --this isn't a statment without merit, but low quality items that didn't last may not be documented because they didn't last.
The selection bias of it all annoys me a little.
2/2
-
@futurebird the
most annoying generalised-from-rich-people idea is that women used to stay at home while the men worked. Poor women have always worked - and usually ran the home too.(But on the disposable nature of things, have you read about why historical examples of shoes in museums tend to be tiny? I can't find the article I read about it now but it's survival bias again - the shoes that someone outgrew survived to be put into a museum, while the ones that fit got worn out.)
@louisa_ @futurebird Also annoying: the idea that "work" and "home" were/are two separate concepts, as though a person's work somehow isn't real if it's done under their own roof.
-
@paulc @futurebird
It's the maintenance that enabled some Roman roads to survive, probably those on major routes. Not really any different to today. -
@futurebird the
most annoying generalised-from-rich-people idea is that women used to stay at home while the men worked. Poor women have always worked - and usually ran the home too.(But on the disposable nature of things, have you read about why historical examples of shoes in museums tend to be tiny? I can't find the article I read about it now but it's survival bias again - the shoes that someone outgrew survived to be put into a museum, while the ones that fit got worn out.)
@louisa_ @futurebird the reason why there’re almost no men’s working or everyday clothes in collections — such clothes rarely survive
also, i’ve been browsing a shop in japan (sadly, i forgot its name) they were selling used clothes from europe from some 1900-1940s — every piece was heavily and visibly mended, it was so unusual to look atthe same happens to fancy wedding dresses in museum collections: it’s not that women were that small, it’s they were married when they were lean teenagers
-
@carrideen @futurebird as documented (for sexism if not racism or ableism, tho these can all be opposed in a unified fashion as historically specific examples of "might makes right" ) by Joanna Russ: one of the first tactics of the pro-oppression structure is to make each generation of protest feel like the first generation of protest.
@jayalane @carrideen @futurebird
When I was in Civil Defense as a young man, we were asked to hold a meeting, select a spokesperson and write down any grievances we might have.
I was there for a month, we never heard anything back. The whole thing started over again with the next group.
