Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
26 Indlæg 20 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

    Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

    Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

    babblinggeek@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    babblinggeek@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    babblinggeek@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    @cstross it nails the “most people’s use cases” in a price point and feature set that’s really hard to argue with

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

      HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

      Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

      Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

      hmwilker@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
      hmwilker@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
      hmwilker@social.tchncs.de
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      @cstross It’s probably the first instance of what will turn out to become _A Laptop_ (no further qualifications necessary, because it does everything everybody expects and needs. Edge cases and niche applications need not apply.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

        Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

        Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidgerard@circumstances.run
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        @cstross I believe it does have the AI coprocessor

        cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

          Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

          Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

          salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
          salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
          salty@mastodon.nz
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          @cstross 8GB RAM definitely still feels like it could be a limiting factor, though. Although to be fair iOS handles it pretty well.

          markn@mastodonapp.ukM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

            Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

            Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

            kmck@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
            kmck@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
            kmck@mas.to
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @cstross I did wonder what Apple was going to do with the “our base CPU is more powerful than most people need it to be” problem besides render the UI through a VFX pipeline.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

              @cstross I believe it does have the AI coprocessor

              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
              cstross@wandering.shop
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @davidgerard It does, and I've got Apple Intelligence firmly switched off.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

                Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

                Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

                ebooksyearn@thepit.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                ebooksyearn@thepit.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                ebooksyearn@thepit.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @cstross I'm curious what's going to happen now that 90% or more of computer users can do everything they want with a $500 laptop. That same level of machine would have struggled with 10 browser tabs just a minute ago

                cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

                  Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

                  Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

                  sweetshark@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sweetshark@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sweetshark@social.tchncs.de
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @cstross
                  So, which business models are obsoleted now that compute is a commodity?

                  Is it maybe the folks that scream you need AI in everything, so that more datacenters need to be build? Cant allow people to be happy on decade old hardware because that is dampening demand.

                  cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ebooksyearn@thepit.socialE ebooksyearn@thepit.social

                    @cstross I'm curious what's going to happen now that 90% or more of computer users can do everything they want with a $500 laptop. That same level of machine would have struggled with 10 browser tabs just a minute ago

                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cstross@wandering.shop
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @ebooksyearn Yes. As it happens I have a ~$500 machine from 2 years ago. Intel N100 cpu, 12Gb RAM, same size SSD: runs Linux Mint nicely, but the flip side is the battery life is about 2h30m instead of 16h. A deal-breaker, that.

                    Apple *somehow* squared the circle.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

                      Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

                      Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

                      ringles@bookstodon.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ringles@bookstodon.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ringles@bookstodon.com
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @cstross

                      Got a cheap notebook from 'reward points' at work. I named it 'cromulence'; everything about it is (just) acceptable.

                      CPU is okay, screen is meh, battery life is good enough. RAM and storage were barely sufficient, but I was easily able to open it up and add RAM and a better NVME I had lying around. Of course I put Linux on it. (Those last three are not common, of course...)

                      That was before the Neo, which has much better specs - except I can't bump up the RAM or storage on it. 🤷

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sweetshark@social.tchncs.deS sweetshark@social.tchncs.de

                        @cstross
                        So, which business models are obsoleted now that compute is a commodity?

                        Is it maybe the folks that scream you need AI in everything, so that more datacenters need to be build? Cant allow people to be happy on decade old hardware because that is dampening demand.

                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstross@wandering.shop
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        @Sweetshark No, those people are scam artists, nothing more and nothing less. (Aside from the delusional sheep who're following them because they don't understand the basics of CS, much less the cognitive psychology hack that makes the tech-illiterate mistake a "chinese room" for a person.)

                        speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tubemeister@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tubemeister@mstdn.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #13

                          @mherbert @cstross You’re thinking of phones. The laptops still have them.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            @Sweetshark No, those people are scam artists, nothing more and nothing less. (Aside from the delusional sheep who're following them because they don't understand the basics of CS, much less the cognitive psychology hack that makes the tech-illiterate mistake a "chinese room" for a person.)

                            speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                            speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                            speakertomanagers@wandering.shop
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #14

                            @cstross @Sweetshark
                            The Chinese Room was debunked 40 years ago, and I still get people quoting it at me. Not to speak of the people who don’t understand that Neural Nets are not anything like biological neurons. I get tired of explaining CogSci 100 (prerequisite for 101).

                            cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS speakertomanagers@wandering.shop

                              @cstross @Sweetshark
                              The Chinese Room was debunked 40 years ago, and I still get people quoting it at me. Not to speak of the people who don’t understand that Neural Nets are not anything like biological neurons. I get tired of explaining CogSci 100 (prerequisite for 101).

                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shop
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #15

                              @SpeakerToManagers Chinese Rooms as a procedural system were Searle's attempt at refuting the idea of simulation on philosophical grounds. (He was wrong.) But chatbots with no underlying model of the world aren't conscious either.

                              speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

                                Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

                                Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

                                stevendbrewer@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stevendbrewer@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stevendbrewer@wandering.shop
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #16

                                @cstross It reminds me of when people used to ask me whether to get more RAM or a faster processor and I said, "Buy the largest monitor you can afford, and you have any money left over, buy a computer."

                                kilroy_was_here@dobbs.townK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  @SpeakerToManagers Chinese Rooms as a procedural system were Searle's attempt at refuting the idea of simulation on philosophical grounds. (He was wrong.) But chatbots with no underlying model of the world aren't conscious either.

                                  speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  speakertomanagers@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  speakertomanagers@wandering.shop
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #17

                                  @cstross
                                  True. Searle assumed some godlike being carefully filled in the google or so entries in the lookup tables that controlled the way the little man (or was it a p-zombie? I get confused) inside the room created the translations. I am seriously annoyed by thought experiments that start with incoherent postulates.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    HYPOTHESIS: while Moore's Law dominated performance in laptops, the rule was "cheap, fast, low power—pick any two".

                                    Moore's Law is coming to an end. The Macbook Neo says "why choose?"

                                    Nobody needs a laptop with a 40 hour battery life. Nor does anybody needs 200 cpu threads and an AI coprocessor and 256Gb of RAM and 8Tb of SSD. So we're finally seeing the sweet spot in the phase diagram drift inexorably towards the corner labelled "cheap".

                                    juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #18

                                    @cstross

                                    I checked hardware prices for servers yesterday, and a 16 GB DDR5 RAM module had a purchase price of €1600.

                                    How long will "cheap" remain an option under current market conditions?

                                    lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL su_liam@mas.toS 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                                      @cstross

                                      I checked hardware prices for servers yesterday, and a 16 GB DDR5 RAM module had a purchase price of €1600.

                                      How long will "cheap" remain an option under current market conditions?

                                      lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizza
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #19

                                      @juergen_hubert @cstross, ouch.

                                      The last RAM which I bought (2×8GB DDR4 3200) cost about £40, though that was 2½ years ago. If the increase in price were in line with inflation, it'd be somewhere around £43 to £45 – but no. From the same supplier, it now costs £145.

                                      Let that popping sound be heard soon…

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        @ebooksyearn Yes. As it happens I have a ~$500 machine from 2 years ago. Intel N100 cpu, 12Gb RAM, same size SSD: runs Linux Mint nicely, but the flip side is the battery life is about 2h30m instead of 16h. A deal-breaker, that.

                                        Apple *somehow* squared the circle.

                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        drchaos@sauropods.win
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #20

                                        @cstross @ebooksyearn interesting! My old n450 (I think it was ..) laptop (ok. Netbook) managed more than 8 hours easily, I used it every day on the commute, writing papers or code. Wouldn't work for my eyesight these days, though.
                                        And I have been arguing that we have reached good enough for a while. My kids' second hand ThinkPad is not really worse than my newer one. Except for battery life due to wear.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

                                          @cstross

                                          I checked hardware prices for servers yesterday, and a 16 GB DDR5 RAM module had a purchase price of €1600.

                                          How long will "cheap" remain an option under current market conditions?

                                          su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          su_liam@mas.to
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #21

                                          @juergen_hubert @cstross There’s always looting ai data centers as an option. Probably not a solo thing.

                                          juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper