Today we launched https://code.overheid.nl: the NL government-wide code platform 🥳🥳

[d1@autistics.life]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer Awesome! I wish #Canadians could similarly get their acts together. There is a limp-biscuited, vague policy on sovereignty here, but nothing to speak of really seems to come from it:
https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/cloud-services/digital-sovereignty/digital-sovereignty-framework-improve-digital-readiness.html
#Canada #ElbowsUp

[slotos@toot.community]

@reinouts Forgejo development is not held captive by a US company. Good luck merging a feature that competes with an enterprise offering to Gitlab CE.

[projectmoon@social.agnos.is]

@Gina@fosstodon.org @opensource@social.overheid.nl @BZKopensource@social.overheid.nl @developer@social.overheid.nl now they just need to open source DigiD

[projectmoon@social.agnos.is]

@Gina@fosstodon.org @opensource@social.overheid.nl @BZKopensource@social.overheid.nl @developer@social.overheid.nl what is the success metric for this pilot?

[reinouts@mastodon.green]

@slotos While they're officially headquartered in the US, they have always been a fully remote company with Ukrainian and Dutch founders, IIRC.
I do see that merging enterprise features into CE might not be accepted by GitLab inc., but then again, the EE sales are what keeps development going. It's a double-edged sword.

[slotos@toot.community]

@reinouts The country of incorporation is what’s important. It dictates how corporation has to act towards its shareholders.

Nationality of the founders is irrelevant here.

Also, I didn’t say „merging enterprise features”, I said „feature that competes with an enterprise offering”. It is a contribution gatekeeping system driven by US legal precedent.

[johan@social.codefor.nl]

@wsslmn @Gina @wlaatje @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @marlenabcn but I am curious what it is...

[codo@fosstodon.org]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer

It seems to be hosted at Odidio. That's weird.

https://hosting-checker.net/websites/code.overheid.nl

[jos@social.nlnet.nl]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer

Congratulations. The checklist is progressing.

social.overheid.nl
code.overheid.nl
️ mail.overheid.nl
☐ office.overheid.nl

[slothrop@chaos.social]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer Nice work! Congratulations, and much success.

[sirkadirov@mastodon.social]

@Gina, congrats on this great milestone! It's awesome that government agencies are thinking about these important initiatives, wish we had a team like yours in our Ministry of digital transformation (Ukraine)... Fingers crossed for your success! 🤩

[michaelmaguire@mstdn.ca]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer Is Dutch digital sovereignty being protected by Anubis? https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis

[gina@fosstodon.org]

@michaelmaguire @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer it should be! We'll look at implementing it.

[michaelmaguire@mstdn.ca]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer oh, cool! I was only half-teasing though. I had clicked through some of your announcement docs and when I tried the Forgejo "Try it now" link it used Anubis and said "Made with in " and I thought it was great that Dutch digital sovereignty would be protected by Canadians.

[janneke@todon.nl]

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer
Great. Have they decided how they will be sponsoring @Codeberg yet?

[migy@chaos.social]

Awesome!!

@Gina @forgejo @BZKopensource @tomootes @bo @johan @marlenabcn @opensource @developer

[thibaultamartin@mamot.fr]

@Gina I’m always cheering for government and the public sector adopting OSS projects like @forgejo!

Do @BZKopensource and other participating organizations contribute (financially and in persondays) to the sustainability of the project?

I mean either hiring the volunteers who work on it, directly contributing to the project, or supporting Forgejo financially

[cnx@awkward.place]

@janneke@todon.nl, I’d rather it doesn’t grow into another GitHub, money should be put on forge federation instead IMHO.

[janneke@todon.nl]

@cnx
Codeberg is the nonprofit founded by the developers of @forgejo

Please support @Codeberg

[cnx@awkward.place]

@janneke@todon.nl, @forgejo@floss.social being under the umbrella of @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de does not mean all money going into Codeberg is for funding Forgejo. If one uses the service it makes sense to support it, but in the case of NL, it should not be contributing to the centralization of hosting services.