In the early 1970s, most folks could do some mental arithmetic.

[jenesuispasgoth@pouet.chapril.org]

@robpike if, as some people say, LLMs were indeed a way to scale up code production, and produce correct code, much like compilers do, and putting aside ethical/ecological matters aside (even though they're the prime reason i have an issue with LLMs), I believe the argument could be made. But the fact is that this is not how things work with LLM, with their stochastic processes.

[mongoosestudios@hachyderm.io]

@robpike It's the intersection of liking my ability to think and utter disgust for grifting bullshit spewers.

Incidentally I have also stopped setting GPS destinations for anything not time critical or very long distance.

[uucidl@hachyderm.io]

@robpike at one point I realized that to be a successful businessman it was most probably an advantage if you could do arithmetic in your head, and that changed a bit my perspective on calculators

[mattblaze@federate.social]

@robpike The test for me is whether it helps me understand something or substitutes for me understanding something. LLMs, at least as currently implemented, seem overwhelmingly to be aiming for the latter.

[beamanuel@mastodon.social]

@llimllib @robpike youre literally undermining yourself, you can get there with enough dedication. cool people like rob werent born like that.

[ftranschel@norden.social]

@uucidl @robpike This is most definitely true, but at the same time, knowing what problems to delegate (if only to calculators!) is an even greater asset.

[tiagox@indieweb.social]

@robpike calculators and maps took over specific activities. AI is taking over thinking, we're giving up the ability to make our own every day decisions.

[ohir@social.vivaldi.net]

@llimllib
> changes your perspective

This debraining thing is making brilliant programmers mediocre, and average Joes dumb. The conditionals mishap (think backdoor) they would spot as you typed it some 30 months ago now can pass through in their own production. The ability to do real architectural work vanishes a bit slower, but it is noticeable. And debraining current generation of programmers is not the worst thing around artificial idiocy, the chop on junior's ability to _learn_ is the most terrifying effect I saw. It looks like now it physically pains them if you ask 'why' or 'how'.

How can we pass the craft to our younglings exposed to this drug if they conditioned themselves to be reverse centaurs?

@robpike

[mikestok@mstdn.ca]

@robpike @ChrisMayLA6 @dabeaz
Might as well go all the way and outlaw clean public water, electricity, public waste water, and health and dental care so we can get back to surviving like escaped domestic pets.

[evan@cosocial.ca]

@robpike Have you programmed with them before? Or are you concerned that once you tried them, you wouldn't be able to stop?

[lukefromdc@kolektiva.social]

@robpike Years ago, someone no doubt being paid shit wages accidently short-changed me at a store register. They tried to stand behind their wrong math, not thinking a guy with long hair and old clothes like me could add and subtract 4 places with the decimal after the first two in my head. My calculation stood however. The line was building up and I suggested counting the money in the register and that was that.

[mordenacus@mastodon.social]

@creachadair @robpike @dabeaz

It's pretty bad in universities too. Lots of students using them, cheesing their grades with minimal brainpower.
I don't, because I love solving problems (why let a machine have all the fun), but its frustrating to see people being so short sighted. Has nobody read Dune in the past 20 years?

Basking in the sheer wave of panic that floods the library when people lose access to their chatbots all at once (thanks, cloudflare), is, admittedly, incredibly funny.

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@robpike

so what if we can't do mental arithmetic
who cares
we have calculators that cost like a buck
I can use my brain for other things

as for that "polish study" I bet if you carefully read it, and understood what you read, that the study would not be very pursuasive

[xenophon@mastodon.online]

@robpike I've been leaving Google Maps off my phone and using stuff like CoMaps, which forces you to actually know how to navigate/know what you're looking for. Even for me, as someone totally inept at spatial skills and direction, it has helped me intuit navigation just a bit better.

[ferret@hub.workersofthe.world]

@@robpike.io tbf there isn't really an alternative to digital navigation now. We used to buy maps and go off those. There were more areas where people could easily pull over and look, as well. Now both of those things are a relic.

[hi_cial@donphan.social]

@robpike calculators didnt kill my math ability- it never existed. i have dyscalculia. i have to shut my eyes to focus to do simple arithmetic in my head because the numerical shapes are so similar they become malleable in my minds' eye ...

i guess the argument here is what is accessibility to some is an excuse to not try to others. but i fail to see gen ai as an aid for ANYONE. except ceos n sex pests who need gassing up, and they do not need access tools. that is not equitable.

however a society sick on the late stages of capitalism doesnt care abt any of that. it just wants you as easily influenced, frightened, lonely and confused as it wants you to give up your money. the worse a consumer feels and the more helpless, the more you can spin the tale that buying a new product will fix them....

[bouriquet@mastodon.social]

@robpike I remember trying to write in assembly language.
Load A
Load B
Mul A,B
Stor
Mov

[aka_quant_noir@hcommons.social]

@robpike

Early adopter syndrome. Thankfully, I got over that years ago. We don't have regulations to help us understand what's a safe technology, so people are treating LLMs like a shovel. Just like they have been with apps on their phone, with fine print, and with just about any consumer product.

It's not that we're suddenly stupid. It's that we've been sold a bill of goods, and never read the fine print. Most of us are unable to resist a charming huckster.

[gbraad@mastodon.social]

@robpike however, the use of pocket calculators also declined. I do not have on my desk, seldom start the application. I short, I think this is a side effect of it being a novelty. Use will likely decline, but it won't go away... But before it does, many will suffer from being deskilled.

[slotos@toot.community]

@robpike I would also add that while calculators (or abacuses, or whatever) can be used as an argument in favor of LLMs, Google Maps is a great argument against them.

Inability to orient yourself without a faulty device is a major hindrance and could kill you. Your brain loses that ability not because Google Maps are always correct, but because you stoped using it.

LLMs don’t need to produce correct output for you to lose skills, they just have to stop you from exercising said skills.