Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Have you ever used a zipper?

Have you ever used a zipper?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
134 Indlæg 73 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

    Metacognition is something I highlight in my book. These are *learnable skills* and they are *very predictive* for real-world outcomes. People who cultivate habits of puncturing cognitive illusions form expertise, and make the people around them better thinkers too.

    Amazing how much we can learn just from a little zipper!

    https://www.drcathicks.com/#book

    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    martinvermeer@fediscience.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #110

    @grimalkina

    Remembering how someone used a similar technique against the climate denialist claim that it is not humans but undersea volcanoes that cause the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. 'Okay, but we know how much fossil fuels the countries of the world are burning, and how much CO2 is released in the process. Where does that all go?' Now we are talking numbers, and models, and there is just no consistent way to make it work where the human CO2 all goes 'somewhere else' (ocean? Vegetation? Rock weathering?) while only the volcanic CO2 collects in the atmosphere...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

      In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

      - how a sewing machine works
      - how a can opener works
      - how a flush toilet operates
      - how the heart pumps blood
      - how piano keys make sound

      Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
      - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
      - how a transistor works

      *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #111

      @grimalkina Oh, that IS fun!

      First off, no I can't explain how a zipper works. I understand the principle to a degree, but the specific geometries that work or don't work are beyond me.

      But sewing machine, can opener, flush toilet (both US style and UK style), heart pumping, piano, aqualung pressure regulation - I just happen to know all of those and have had need to fix most of them.

      Not transistor, though. Relay, yes. Transistor, no.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

        In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

        - how a sewing machine works
        - how a can opener works
        - how a flush toilet operates
        - how the heart pumps blood
        - how piano keys make sound

        Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
        - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
        - how a transistor works

        *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

        fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fgbjr@indieweb.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        fgbjr@indieweb.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #112

        @grimalkina It's unfair to include sewing machines because they work by magic. Especially four-thread sergers.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

          Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

          Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

          k9ox@mastodon.radioK This user is from outside of this forum
          k9ox@mastodon.radioK This user is from outside of this forum
          k9ox@mastodon.radio
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #113

          @grimalkina
          I figured out how a zipper worked by looking closely. This might have been on the zippered coat I wore in grade school.

          I might have been older when I understood the “strength in numbers” offered by the regular interlock when a zipper broke down from years of use.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

            Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

            Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

            billd@universeodon.comB This user is from outside of this forum
            billd@universeodon.comB This user is from outside of this forum
            billd@universeodon.com
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #114

            @grimalkina Zippers? I’m still figuring out buttons.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

              In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

              - how a sewing machine works
              - how a can opener works
              - how a flush toilet operates
              - how the heart pumps blood
              - how piano keys make sound

              Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
              - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
              - how a transistor works

              *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

              ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
              ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
              ewen@social.ewenbell.com
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #115
              @grimalkina

              I have been lucky to know people who own boats, and occasionally get on the water for a sail. It's magic when you put up a big sheet of canvas and watch the wind move around the surface. That same sail can catch the wind to push the boat along, or cut the wind to pull it forward.

              That a yacht can sail INTO the wind at all makes perfect sense from the physics, but absolutely no sense to my brain. It still feels improbable and weird. It's not intuitive at all. I understand on a very superficial level, but totally do not believe it deep down.

              So it feels like magic.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                - Trying to encourage mechanism thinking can break through extremist belief patterns.

                You might have heard "facts don't change minds, feelings do." Well, KIND OF. Facts, feelings and interpretations are actually all deeply intertwined in our processing of the world. It's tempting to think that our minds process and absorb the world like tape recorders. If I list a bunch of reasons why I support a policy, maybe that will convince someone. But dissecting their causal model might work much better.

                ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                ewen@social.ewenbell.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                ewen@social.ewenbell.com
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #116
                @grimalkina

                This is true from my experience. When you do get a chance to ask more detailed questions from people with extreme beliefs, they often stumble.

                They are also the most resistant to actually digging into those ideas of course. That's often how they got there in the first place, by outsourcing the thinking.
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                  Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                  Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                  rx13@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rx13@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rx13@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #117

                  @grimalkina
                  Yes, but probably only because I've got young children and it's one of those early age curiosities

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sidereal@kolektiva.socialS sidereal@kolektiva.social

                    @grimalkina It's like, I knew graphite was a dry lubricant. But I don't think I would have ever thought to just use a pencil on a zipper. And now I know that I can apply dry lubricant to all kinds of assemblies by just jamming a pencil up in there. Thanks, metacognition!

                    mjhersh@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mjhersh@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mjhersh@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #118

                    @sidereal @grimalkina Same here! As soon as I read your post it, it made perfect sense. I already knew everything I needed to know to understand it. But I NEVER would have come up with that idea on my own.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                      Have you ever used a zipper? Odds are you have. Are you pretty good at it? Odds are! You've probably successfully used a zipper many, many times. You probably can't even remember when and where you learned how to operate a zipper. If you're a good zipper user and we sat you down in a room and gave you ten zippered garments, you'd probably fluently and flawlessly be able to zip them up and down.

                      Now......can you explain how a zipper works?

                      nilace@curloftheburl.nylarea.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nilace@curloftheburl.nylarea.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nilace@curloftheburl.nylarea.com
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #119

                      @grimalkina Love this post! (p.s. zippers are a fantastic invention of the kind that leaves me thinking: "How could anyone think of this?")

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                        In this study, the researchers asked about a range of stimuli, which in my humble opinion* are really fun to quiz yourself on. Can you explain:

                        - how a sewing machine works
                        - how a can opener works
                        - how a flush toilet operates
                        - how the heart pumps blood
                        - how piano keys make sound

                        Some of these are far more elaborate, haha:
                        - how the aqualung regulates air-pressure
                        - how a transistor works

                        *granted...I became a psychologist so maybe my sense of fun is warped

                        richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        richlv@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #120

                        @grimalkina Oooh, this is great.
                        Am I falling for some trap by bringing up "The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work" (Lawson, 2006)? 🙂

                        https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03195929

                        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                          - Trying to encourage mechanism thinking can break through extremist belief patterns.

                          You might have heard "facts don't change minds, feelings do." Well, KIND OF. Facts, feelings and interpretations are actually all deeply intertwined in our processing of the world. It's tempting to think that our minds process and absorb the world like tape recorders. If I list a bunch of reasons why I support a policy, maybe that will convince someone. But dissecting their causal model might work much better.

                          splitradix@assemblag.esS This user is from outside of this forum
                          splitradix@assemblag.esS This user is from outside of this forum
                          splitradix@assemblag.es
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #121

                          @grimalkina Very interesting thread, I've just ordered your book. Have you ever read "A Theory of System Justification" by John Jost? If not I feel it might be of interest.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • richlv@mastodon.socialR richlv@mastodon.social

                            @grimalkina Oooh, this is great.
                            Am I falling for some trap by bringing up "The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work" (Lawson, 2006)? 🙂

                            https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03195929

                            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grimalkina@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #122

                            @richlv oh I've seen and love that one

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                              The vast majority of zipper users -- skilled, successful zipper users! -- can't explain how a zipper works.

                              This is a charming, famous example that comes from cognitive science/psychology work on The Illusion of Explanatory Depth: "Most people feel they understand the world with far greater detail, coherence, and depth than they really do"

                              Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive science, 26(5), 521-562.

                              zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zombiecide@polyglot.city
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #123

                              @grimalkina but what if you could explain how you *think* a zipper works (from carefully repairing several of them) but you have no idea if what you came up with is mostly correct, though not complete, or a useful lie, because you never actually talk with people about zippers?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.netW wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.net

                                @grimalkina This is how I ended up with an enduring Special Interest in tall ships. Innocently asking “how does a square rigger sail upwind at all?” turned into years of learning the next level of detail.

                                merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                merc@techhub.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #124

                                @wlonk @grimalkina The sheer number of ropes they had on those ships is astounding. Each sail needs something like 5 ropes to control it, and there are 8+ sails.

                                wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.netW 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                  @sinvega there is a fun example Tom Griffiths (a computational cognitive scientist) talks about using in his classes/and in his book: imagine that you are far removed from our civilization a thousand years into the future and you've dug up a cash register. How would you go about trying to learn how it worked? What it was for? What could you infer from it (for instance, could you understand the rules of arithmetic given a cash register)?

                                  merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  merc@techhub.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #125

                                  @grimalkina @sinvega An archaeologist would probably label a cash register as "a ritual object", which isn't exactly wrong, but also not terribly useful.

                                  Also, a modern-ish cash register has too much of the magic in one or more integrated circuits. Which means everything the operator touches goes into the IC, and sometimes when the IC decides it's time, the drawer opens, or something.

                                  More interesting are purely mechanical things. The peak of interesting mechanical things is probably WWII, when they had entire artillery control computers on battleships that were made from hubs, gears, cams, etc.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cohentheblue@ohai.socialC cohentheblue@ohai.social

                                    @NuclearOatmeal @grimalkina Gearing pulls the sewed fabric forward in step with the needle movement, with the use of the curved metal bit that locks the fabric in place just enough that fabric does not bunch up but still moves freely. Usually helped by guiding the fabric with your hand, for manual sewing machines.

                                    Used to be I didn't think about these things, as I learned more about how to model something in my head I've gotten much better just looking at a thing and seeing how it works.

                                    merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    merc@techhub.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #126

                                    @cohentheblue @NuclearOatmeal @grimalkina IMO the magic in the sewing machine is how the bobbin and needle interact so that the top and bottom threads are connected.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • merc@techhub.socialM merc@techhub.social

                                      @wlonk @grimalkina The sheer number of ropes they had on those ships is astounding. Each sail needs something like 5 ropes to control it, and there are 8+ sails.

                                      wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.netW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.netW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      wlonk@mastodon.transneptune.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #127

                                      @merc I recently did a 1/57 scale sloop and it took about 6 feet of scale rope just for the standing rigging. It’s bonkers.

                                      merc@techhub.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nxskok@cupoftea.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nxskok@cupoftea.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #128

                                        @scy @grimalkina they also have one called "You (likely) don't understand how a sewing machine works"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech

                                          @grimalkina reading this post makes me feel like rabbithole georg because I have too many "yes"es 😅 (or at least 'yes' enough that I might be fuzzy on the exact details but can explain the fundamental mechanisms)

                                          merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          merc@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          merc@techhub.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #129

                                          @joepie91 @grimalkina Yeah, I was answering "more or less" to most of them. Mostly that comes from fixing them.

                                          I've fixed enough broken zippers that I know how the teeth mesh, how the pull separates and joins the teeth, etc.

                                          I've fixed a fair number of broken toilets, so I know how the plunger works, the float, the flapper, etc. Though, to be fair, I'd have to be sitting in front of a toilet with the lid off to properly explain it.

                                          I've fought with broken can openers, so I know that mechanism. I also know a few of the alternate versions of can openers, which IMO are mostly worse designs.

                                          I learned how pianos work, just because they're neat mechanical devices.

                                          As for the heart, my mother unfortunately has persistent atrial fibrillation, so I know a bit about how the heart is *supposed* to work.

                                          And... I took a course in semiconductor physics in university, and though it's been a few decades, I still remember the some of basics of a BJT and a MOSFET, including the quantum basis for what's happening.

                                          As for an aqualung, I don't even know what that is. It sounds like SCUBA gear?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper