Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
30 Indlæg 21 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • flashmobofone@mastodon.artF flashmobofone@mastodon.art

    @mhoye No it isn't.

    They already have all of your info. We know this because the FBI just inadvertently revealed it by producing video evidence publicly that wasn't supposed to exist.

    They have your info and they are feeding it to your government freely and without a warrant.

    ID verification is just a simple means of proving you confirmed someone isn't a child.

    charogg@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    charogg@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    charogg@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #15

    @FlashMobOfOne @mhoye According to your logic, why they would need to check it isn't a child if they already know?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

      brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      brouhaha@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #16

      @mhoye
      Your papers are not in order.

      europlus@social.europlus.zoneE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #17

        @mhoye Yup, they are tired of not being able to tell whose a dog and whose a human on the Internet 😃

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

          phogl@social.cologneP This user is from outside of this forum
          phogl@social.cologneP This user is from outside of this forum
          phogl@social.cologne
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #18

          @mhoye not defending the age verification at all or any of that shit...
          But at least they designed in Europe the upcoming EUDI Wallet (digital wallet) they now want to use for that in a way that you can for example just disclose "yup, I'm over 18" not more of your personal information

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

            @passenger @mhoye Those worst people are mostly bots or fake. Rarely are they using their real names. ICE wear masks.

            The ones who go public: they should be in court facing anti hate laws. But instead they're protected because they don't even live in my country. X and Facebook need to be banned where I am to fix this.

            passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            passenger@kolektiva.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #19

            @txtx @mhoye

            I speak as a somewhat experienced antifascist who started doing infiltrations around 2013-2014, in the start of what was later called the alt-Right; and who has done more than his share of street actions.

            There's a myth that these sorts of accounts are mostly bots, and I really don't think that's true. Like yes, some of them are impostors, that is certainly the case. But if you look at the polls, Reform is at 28.6% in the UK and RN is at 35% in France. That means a quarter of Brits and a third of French hold fascist views, and so if you see a quarter to a third of social media accounts being openly fascist, that's about what you'd expect. That's just who Europeans are.

            In my infiltration work, one thing I notice is that the hyperonline gommos tend to have anime avatars and stuff like that, but the more scary people, those with jobs and houses and families and blood-and-soil politics, those tend to be the same person online as they are in real life. In antifascist communities we are deeply security-conscious, but these people really tend not to be. If you wear a mask around them they'll get suspicious and, in my experience, will lecture you about how covid is fake. Their security doesn't come from anonymity but from tight social conformity and from knowing that the cops agree with them.

            They are the people who try to propel Jordan Bardella and Nigel Farage into office, will queue up to work at Frontex, and who have scary domestic violence records. They are not bots, they are worse than that.

            txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

              @passenger @mhoye Those worst people are mostly bots or fake. Rarely are they using their real names. ICE wear masks.

              The ones who go public: they should be in court facing anti hate laws. But instead they're protected because they don't even live in my country. X and Facebook need to be banned where I am to fix this.

              jdb_env@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jdb_env@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jdb_env@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #20

              @txtx @passenger @mhoye
              People need to understand the harm done to people and society by gafam.

              The only account I had was on linkedin, to have professional visibility.
              But this too is populated by [boosted] "influencers" and "followers".

              My way to connect with ppl makes all this boring to use.

              I find mastodon here more convenient to link with ppl having the same interests.

              Not following and not leading.
              No ads. Perfect for me.

              Facebook : fuck off, I have enough friends.

              diogoconstantino@masto.ptD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • passenger@kolektiva.socialP passenger@kolektiva.social

                @txtx @mhoye

                I speak as a somewhat experienced antifascist who started doing infiltrations around 2013-2014, in the start of what was later called the alt-Right; and who has done more than his share of street actions.

                There's a myth that these sorts of accounts are mostly bots, and I really don't think that's true. Like yes, some of them are impostors, that is certainly the case. But if you look at the polls, Reform is at 28.6% in the UK and RN is at 35% in France. That means a quarter of Brits and a third of French hold fascist views, and so if you see a quarter to a third of social media accounts being openly fascist, that's about what you'd expect. That's just who Europeans are.

                In my infiltration work, one thing I notice is that the hyperonline gommos tend to have anime avatars and stuff like that, but the more scary people, those with jobs and houses and families and blood-and-soil politics, those tend to be the same person online as they are in real life. In antifascist communities we are deeply security-conscious, but these people really tend not to be. If you wear a mask around them they'll get suspicious and, in my experience, will lecture you about how covid is fake. Their security doesn't come from anonymity but from tight social conformity and from knowing that the cops agree with them.

                They are the people who try to propel Jordan Bardella and Nigel Farage into office, will queue up to work at Frontex, and who have scary domestic violence records. They are not bots, they are worse than that.

                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                txtx@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #21

                @passenger @mhoye The UK/Brexit are perfect examples of foreign dictators influencing citizens via social media disinformation campaigns, anonymous & bot accounts etc.

                This is not something I want to see further replicated anywhere in the EU.

                Being an 'anti-facist' on X is a contradiction. It's like hating on Mickey Mouse at Disneyland.

                passenger@kolektiva.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                  @passenger @mhoye The UK/Brexit are perfect examples of foreign dictators influencing citizens via social media disinformation campaigns, anonymous & bot accounts etc.

                  This is not something I want to see further replicated anywhere in the EU.

                  Being an 'anti-facist' on X is a contradiction. It's like hating on Mickey Mouse at Disneyland.

                  passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  passenger@kolektiva.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #22

                  @txtx @mhoye

                  Where they go, we go. If you want to know what Mickey Mouse is up to, rather than just hate him and want to avoid him, Disneyland is the place to be.

                  (I don't monitor twitter though, it's just a garbage hellsite, and most of the real fash are elsewhere. British hard fash mostly use Telegram, soft fash mostly use Whatsapp, and it's worth monitoring both.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • brouhaha@mastodon.socialB brouhaha@mastodon.social

                    @mhoye
                    Your papers are not in order.

                    europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                    europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                    europlus@social.europlus.zone
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #23

                    @brouhaha @mhoye can you explain this gap in your social media posting history?

                    You seem to have forgotten to inform us of this e-mail you’ve been using since 2015…

                    axel_hartmann@digitalcourage.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • europlus@social.europlus.zoneE europlus@social.europlus.zone

                      @brouhaha @mhoye can you explain this gap in your social media posting history?

                      You seem to have forgotten to inform us of this e-mail you’ve been using since 2015…

                      axel_hartmann@digitalcourage.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      axel_hartmann@digitalcourage.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      axel_hartmann@digitalcourage.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #24

                      @europlus @brouhaha @mhoye - with the proposed US visa / visa-waiver requirements, any of these would invalidate your "immigration status" as a visitor, putting you at real risk of indefinite incarceration at an ICE concentration camp.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        Once you realize it’s not “age verification”, but actually “identity verification”, then it’s easy to understand that the real goal is “papers, please” for the entire internet.

                        spdrnl@sigmoid.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        spdrnl@sigmoid.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        spdrnl@sigmoid.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #25

                        @mhoye I heard thatPeter Thiel's #palantir is behind the Discord age verification deal.

                        It's dystopian, and their closing in.

                        #EU stop the deals with these people. If in doubt, read 'IBM and the Holocaust'.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                          @dalias @mhoye Facebook & X are anarchist/anti fascist? I don't agree.

                          diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
                          diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
                          diogoconstantino@masto.pt
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #26

                          @txtx some people will accounts there are, and so are people with accounts in other places, because social media it's not just those places, and because the requeriments for id verification are way broader than social media.

                          @dalias @mhoye

                          txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jdb_env@mastodon.socialJ jdb_env@mastodon.social

                            @txtx @passenger @mhoye
                            People need to understand the harm done to people and society by gafam.

                            The only account I had was on linkedin, to have professional visibility.
                            But this too is populated by [boosted] "influencers" and "followers".

                            My way to connect with ppl makes all this boring to use.

                            I find mastodon here more convenient to link with ppl having the same interests.

                            Not following and not leading.
                            No ads. Perfect for me.

                            Facebook : fuck off, I have enough friends.

                            diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
                            diogoconstantino@masto.ptD This user is from outside of this forum
                            diogoconstantino@masto.pt
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #27

                            @Jdb_env id verification can also cause harms, and they don't apply only to gafam (and legally couldn't).

                            @txtx @passenger @mhoye

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • txtx@mastodon.socialT txtx@mastodon.social

                              @mhoye Unpopular opinion:

                              Identity verification isn't so unattractive in 2026 — social media is destroying democracies via anonymous armies of bot people steered by aggressive foreign actors like Putin and Musk.

                              The libertarian model that the Internet was built on is failing societies.

                              magnus@venner.networkM This user is from outside of this forum
                              magnus@venner.networkM This user is from outside of this forum
                              magnus@venner.network
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #28

                              @txtx @mhoye you dont need identity verification to combat bots, proof of human is enough

                              txtx@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • diogoconstantino@masto.ptD diogoconstantino@masto.pt

                                @txtx some people will accounts there are, and so are people with accounts in other places, because social media it's not just those places, and because the requeriments for id verification are way broader than social media.

                                @dalias @mhoye

                                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                txtx@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #29

                                @DiogoConstantino

                                I don't agree with the premise that there is no possibility for a solution that takes various factors into consideration.

                                @dalias @mhoye

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • magnus@venner.networkM magnus@venner.network

                                  @txtx @mhoye you dont need identity verification to combat bots, proof of human is enough

                                  txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  txtx@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  txtx@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #30

                                  @magnus That's not at all good enough because it doesn't stop botpeople from Russia and other dictatorships. There's more than enough of them to destroy this kind of simplistic solution — and disinformation factories are only growing.

                                  @mhoye

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                  Svar
                                  • Svar som emne
                                  Login for at svare
                                  • Ældste til nyeste
                                  • Nyeste til ældste
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Log ind

                                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Hjem
                                  • Seneste
                                  • Etiketter
                                  • Populære
                                  • Verden
                                  • Bruger
                                  • Grupper