"EU staff banned from using AI-generated content in official communications" Can confirm - we don't use AI generated images on our socials for instance.

[hpod16@eupolicy.social]

"EU staff banned from using AI-generated content in official communications"
Can confirm - we don't use AI generated images on our socials for instance.
https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-eu-ban-deepfakes-ai-generation-official-messages/

[sylvhem@eldritch.cafe]

@hpod16 Speaking of social medias and official communications, I meant to ask… Is this account a personal one, or is it part of your job?

[hpod16@eupolicy.social]

@Sylvhem
It’s personal
Also says so in my profile description

[sylvhem@eldritch.cafe]

@hpod16 Thank you!

[gargron@mastodon.social]

@hpod16 Thank you!

[androcat@toot.cat]

@hpod16 Very nice!

[_elena@mastodon.social]

@hpod16 FANTASTIC!!!

[clintonanderson@universeodon.com]

@hpod16

Good.

Ban ALL "AI" Slop generation.

[nihkeys@mastodontti.fi]

@hpod16 That article though. Why does Politico feel that it really need to push both-sideism here. I get that the pro-sloppers have commercial interests in more slop use but so end result is predictable but I don't understand the angle of the journalist here.

[mimesatwork@wandering.shop]

@hpod16 it's not much, but it's at least something

[kkarhan@jorts.horse]

@_elena @hpod16 based…

[petrikas@mastodon.art]

@hpod16 Very glad to read this.

However, I'm fairly certain the artwork of these cards were AI-generated:

https://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EUCommission/115439657380816824

[hpod16@eupolicy.social]

@_elena
It's not exactly a new thing, it's just a recent politico article picking up on the Commission's staff guidelines that have been around for a while

[hpod16@eupolicy.social]

@petrikas
sometimes stuff like this slips through the cracks. In this case it's a photo montage with images taken from a stock photo portal, and the initial images were probably generated by AI and not labelled as such... We've become a lot more vigilant to this kind of thing since, and organised trainings for designers on AI, so they can better spot this kind of thing and understand why it's best to avoid.

[petrikas@mastodon.art]

@hpod16 This is excellent news altogether. Thank you!

[hpod16@eupolicy.social]

@nihkeys
No, I agree. The headline is nice and catchy, but the article reeks of commercial interests of the AI business people.

[_ryekdarkener_@mastodon.social]

@hpod16

However the next step is to do a scanning for sense in the handmade communication.

[no_brainer@mastodon.social]

@hpod16 „Can confirm - we don't use AI generated *images* on our socials for instance.“

And how about the rest of the content? https://getmona.app/rich_text/172183068007

[faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot]

@hpod16

[brekke@eupolicy.social]

> The risk that deepfakes could erode trust “should not paralyze you into doing nothing,” said Renout Van Zandycke, who runs the Belgian communications agency Exposure, which has advised several political parties. “Doing nothing is equally as bad.”

So spreading disinformation is only as bad as not doing it. Got it. Excellent advice.
@nihkeys @hpod16