Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
palantiralexkarppeterthiel
60 Indlæg 54 Posters 78 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

    The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

    #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

    A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

    What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

    Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

    And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

    Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

    Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

    These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

    In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

    But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

    After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

    We rejected this in its entirety.

    In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

    And now we see each other in court.

    But why all this?

    Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

    And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

    All of this is making Palantir nervous.

    We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

    We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

    In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

    World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

    The truth.

    All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

    We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

    olivierburnier@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    olivierburnier@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    olivierburnier@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #49

    @adfichter With the new revelations coming out about #PeterMandelson and #Palantir we can imagine that certain of the contracts signed by the UK government could be affected if not cancelled.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

      The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

      #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

      A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

      What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

      Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

      And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

      Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

      Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

      These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

      In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

      But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

      After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

      We rejected this in its entirety.

      In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

      And now we see each other in court.

      But why all this?

      Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

      And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

      All of this is making Palantir nervous.

      We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

      We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

      In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

      World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

      The truth.

      All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

      We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

      mrmanor@social.data.coopM This user is from outside of this forum
      mrmanor@social.data.coopM This user is from outside of this forum
      mrmanor@social.data.coop
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #50

      @adfichter
      Unfortunately many other European countries, including mine 🇩🇰, forges ahead and have implementeret Palantir in the police and military.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

        @srtcd424 @stefanct @dzu @OliverCzulo we're working on a donation solution 🙂 thank you so much!

        the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        the_wub@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #51

        @adfichter @srtcd424 @stefanct @dzu @OliverCzulo Anyone standing up against Palantir deserves my support.

        Especially journalists who have done thorough research and created curated journalism.

        So I have subscribed for now. It will be good for my German skills.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

          The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

          #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

          A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

          What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

          Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

          And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

          Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

          Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

          These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

          In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

          But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

          After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

          We rejected this in its entirety.

          In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

          And now we see each other in court.

          But why all this?

          Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

          And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

          All of this is making Palantir nervous.

          We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

          We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

          In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

          World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

          The truth.

          All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

          We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

          achimkla@eupolicy.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          achimkla@eupolicy.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          achimkla@eupolicy.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #52

          @adfichter Regardless of the chances to win their court case, Palantir can now say (e.g. to investors and media) that they “reject the unfounded allegations of the Swiss media and are suing the originator in court“, and that as long as the court case can be dragged on.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

            The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

            #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

            A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

            What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

            Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

            And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

            Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

            Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

            These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

            In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

            But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

            After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

            We rejected this in its entirety.

            In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

            And now we see each other in court.

            But why all this?

            Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

            And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

            All of this is making Palantir nervous.

            We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

            We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

            In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

            World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

            The truth.

            All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

            We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

            the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #53

            @adfichter in the meantime, they have these "blog" things now.

            #getafuckingblog

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dzu@hostsharing.coopD dzu@hostsharing.coop

              @OliverCzulo @adfichter That is easy to answer: https://shop.republik.ch/

              sebastiangallehr@norden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sebastiangallehr@norden.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sebastiangallehr@norden.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #54

              @dzu
              Schade. Hatte euch gerne unterstützt. Da kann ich aber nur mit einer klassischen Kreditkarte bezahlen. Habe ich aber nicht für das Konto, mit dem ich zahlen muss.
              Könnt ihr nicht SEPA oder #wero anbieten? Oder einen der anderen Zahlungsanbieter wie #liberapay bzw. Alternativen? (https://alternativeto.net/software/liberapay/)
              @OliverCzulo @adfichter

              adfichter@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT tanyakaroli@expressional.social shared this topic
                jonassmith@theforkiverse.comJ jonassmith@theforkiverse.com shared this topic
              • sebastiangallehr@norden.socialS sebastiangallehr@norden.social

                @dzu
                Schade. Hatte euch gerne unterstützt. Da kann ich aber nur mit einer klassischen Kreditkarte bezahlen. Habe ich aber nicht für das Konto, mit dem ich zahlen muss.
                Könnt ihr nicht SEPA oder #wero anbieten? Oder einen der anderen Zahlungsanbieter wie #liberapay bzw. Alternativen? (https://alternativeto.net/software/liberapay/)
                @OliverCzulo @adfichter

                adfichter@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                adfichter@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                adfichter@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #55

                @SebastianGallehr Kontakt@republik.ch hilft dir da schnell weiter! @dzu @OliverCzulo

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

                  The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

                  #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

                  A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

                  What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

                  Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

                  And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

                  Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

                  Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

                  These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

                  In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

                  But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

                  After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

                  We rejected this in its entirety.

                  In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

                  And now we see each other in court.

                  But why all this?

                  Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

                  And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

                  All of this is making Palantir nervous.

                  We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

                  We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

                  In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

                  World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

                  The truth.

                  All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

                  We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

                  adamizcool@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  adamizcool@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  adamizcool@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #56

                  @adfichter they are literally named after THE EVIL EYE FROM LOTR

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

                    The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

                    #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

                    A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

                    What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

                    Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

                    And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

                    Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

                    Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

                    These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

                    In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

                    But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

                    After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

                    We rejected this in its entirety.

                    In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

                    And now we see each other in court.

                    But why all this?

                    Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

                    And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

                    All of this is making Palantir nervous.

                    We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

                    We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

                    In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

                    World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

                    The truth.

                    All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

                    We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

                    rrustema@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rrustema@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rrustema@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #57

                    @adfichter anything we can do to help?

                    I read at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republik that Republik is modelled after @decorrespondent as a magazine.

                    But another subscription for me is a bit too much. Also reading German slows me down.

                    Is there some crowdfunding donation page? The more money for good journalism the better.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • adfichter@infosec.exchangeA adfichter@infosec.exchange

                      The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:

                      #Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.

                      A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.

                      What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.

                      Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.

                      And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.

                      Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.

                      Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”

                      These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.

                      In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.

                      But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.

                      After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.

                      We rejected this in its entirety.

                      In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.

                      And now we see each other in court.

                      But why all this?

                      Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).

                      And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.

                      All of this is making Palantir nervous.

                      We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.

                      We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.

                      In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:

                      World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.

                      The truth.

                      All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.

                      We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.

                      rasmus91@fosstodon.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rasmus91@fosstodon.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rasmus91@fosstodon.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #58

                      @adfichter i find myself curios, in Denmark it's generally structured so that if you are sued, and win, the loser has to pay (within reason) the costs of the winners expenses.

                      Is it the same in Switzerland?

                      I know that the fact its not this way in the US is by and large what enables slap suits; you may be 100% sure you're going to win, but if you can afford the trial, that hardly matters very much.

                      adfichter@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • twilwel@mastodon.nlT twilwel@mastodon.nl

                        @adfichter the fact the company is named “Palantir” should be reason for extreme caution. In the Lord of the Rings (if you’ve not read the books, most have at least seen the films) the Palantir seeing stones are used by Sauron to spy on others and to sow confusion, apathy and fear in those countries. Which seems to be exactly what the software of wacko billionaire Thiel aimes to do in real life.

                        cyberwitch@goingdark.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cyberwitch@goingdark.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cyberwitch@goingdark.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #59

                        @twilwel @adfichter Like, the palantir was a major factor in Denathor's suicidal meltdown BECAUSE OF THE "INTEL" IT GAVE HIM.
                        You'd think it would be terrible marketing, but that would require basic literacy.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • rasmus91@fosstodon.orgR rasmus91@fosstodon.org

                          @adfichter i find myself curios, in Denmark it's generally structured so that if you are sued, and win, the loser has to pay (within reason) the costs of the winners expenses.

                          Is it the same in Switzerland?

                          I know that the fact its not this way in the US is by and large what enables slap suits; you may be 100% sure you're going to win, but if you can afford the trial, that hardly matters very much.

                          adfichter@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adfichter@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                          adfichter@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #60

                          @rasmus91 Yes, its the same. But I am not sure. If of the many points they want us to correct, we need to publish 2 points of their statements...I don't know who is in charge of the costs then.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • bettina@mastodon.nuB bettina@mastodon.nu shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper