If you want people to switch to your non-evil tool:

[akareilly@hachyderm.io]

@adityabhaskar Why is the higher qualifying bar applicable to say, security but not to accessibility?

[surfsup31@social.vivaldi.net]

@riverpunk @doctormo @akareilly The easier said than done part is the domain of the skilled public teacher. I had to pass courses on “Universal Design for Learning” in my masters program and the concepts are exactly what we need in non-evil tech in my opinion. Not only are most people non-techy, a huge percentage have learning disabilities or cognitive impairments that make them more vulnerable to tech-related exploitation and less likely to explore alternatives.

[ferret@hub.workersofthe.world]

@Wren Reilly Agreed with the person above that most proprietary tools are a UX hellhole, and people only use them because they've been locked into using them for however many years or decades.

And one of my favourite parts about FOSS is that I can just open up a Matrix room and there's the lead developer right there, online 24/7 like some kind of maniac, ready to happily answer my questions or let me know if the bug I'm experiencing is going to be fixed in the next little while.

[akareilly@hachyderm.io]

@ferret

Try using a Linux distro without the use of your hands or eyes, from setup to everyday tasks.

Usable for biotypical people doesn’t mean *accessible*

[rigrig@akkoma.tubul.net]

@adityabhaskar@hachyderm.io @akareilly@hachyderm.io It’s not like “pass this list or the fedi council will block your project”, it’s “I made this free thing, why is nobody using it?”

And the bar is higher because free software doesn’t come with corpo sales representatives.

[weirdwriter@caneandable.social]

@adityabhaskar @akareilly Gmail is vastly more keyboard and screen reader friendly then @protonprivacy for example

[secretsloth@mastodon.art]

@akareilly I'm still waiting to find out whether my partner (who just gleefully degoogled his phone and then slammed me for not having done so when my disabilities are the reason I cannot) had technical issues with his solo appointment with our couples therapist last week. Because, as I'm sure you know, most medical software requires chrome or a chrome based browser. I'm not sure if his fancy new firmware will let him install Zoom or not. >

[secretsloth@mastodon.art]

@akareilly he did this whole mansplain thing and it felt like deja vu after having dealt with a whole lot of internet tech bros who do not understand the needs of normal people, much less disabled folks, and who tend to forget living in a rural area is a thing. So I'm just sitting here waiting for him to start realizing how many things he's going to have problems with over time because he jumped off the high dive before taking smaller steps and seeing how hard just that much was.

[weirdwriter@caneandable.social]

I loved this blog post in so many ways! I do somewhat disagree about marketing concepts. Non-tech people love podcasts and love how open podcasts are, and nobody changed how an RSS feed is presented. They know they can use that RSS feed in any podcast app they want. I do think a bigger issue is education, and I am not talking about code, either. I am talking about knowing things like everything on the web is a server. Your browser is just a user agent. Things like that. Learning how email works and how email travels across wires, for example. I don't get the hate for the interoperable word. Non-tech gamers understand it via cross-play as an example. If non-tech people can understand how open the podcast is *and* use an RSS feed, then the podcast community is doing something right. @riverpunk @akareilly

[avincentinspace@furry.engineer]

@akareilly

• do not be an asshole to people who use your program (saying "PRs welcome" in response to a feature request is okay; telling people they're stupid if they can't figure out your UI is not)

• ESPECIALLY do not be an asshole to people who use the program it is an alternative to

• if you're going to tie your software to your politics (as you should), have the common decency to say what they are and how you will respond to people who do not share them in CONTRIBUTING.md

[lususlumi@alovely.space]

@riverpunk @akareilly oh my gosh yes please!!! i am here because i am super passionate about my politics and values but it took me a good 24hours of research to understand and get myself onto the fediverse and its quite intimidating and i reeeaaally want to get more people here (and generally into open source, of which ibe known about and used for years) who i know wont do that work. i dont have any experience in code/programming and am overwhlemed by how many people here are, so it feels pretty alienating figuring out how to use things sometimes, as even if i ask i dont really understand the instructions

[feditips@social.growyourown.services]

@riverpunk @lususlumi

Thank you for the shoutout

And yes, avoiding technical language is really important, there's almost always a non-technical way of saying the same thing!