Welcome Anthropic as a Corporate Patron sponsor of the Blender Foundation’s Development Fund!

[octaviaconamore@cutie.city]

@thibaultmol @UkeleleEric @eden @Blender that's not how psychology works money comes with strings stretched whether you can see them or not, whether they're talked about or not

[geoffl@mastodon.me.uk]

@Blender

Is this The Onion?

[dbat@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@Blender Leaving all the ethics aside, let's take the crooked money!

[quincy@chaos.social]

@Blender

As if wording were the problem.

[keeya@icy.arcticfluff.eu]

@fsiddi Imho there is a thin red line between random corporate sponsor and companies like the "ai fash clique" that are actively trying to do harm. Whether deliberately or out of pure arrogance or ignorance. Sure, it's money that makes a good project get further. But you always need to be aware from where the money comes from.

[psychuan@plush.city]

@thibaultmol @eden @Blender hahahaha

oh wait you're serious. let me laugh even harder

HAHAHAHAHA

[mcwabbit@tenforward.social]

@Blender Although the person behind this account may not even be involved in the agreement, it is still a bad idea. It's taking blood money from an entity hostile to creatives. That threat to their livelihoods alone is bad already. But the party involved is actively supporting fascism. As in: Destroying lives, human and nature alike.

Not cool, man. Not cool.

There must be better ways to get funding. Better does not always mean easy, but there are better ways.

[soulshine@mastodon.social]

@Blender

Oh shit.

[ki@chaos.social]

@Blender
what the fuck?! have you lost your damn mind?

[steamworkgroup@glammr.us]

@Blender Amazingly terrible decision. Just stunning. Accepting money from some demonstrably horrible org like Anthropic aligns you with them and their values. Are these your values now?

Return the money, refuse it, or whatever - or, I suppose, show that you can be bought and that you don't actually care about anyone but yourselves.

[art_codesmith@toot.cafe]

@fsiddi
1. Why even accept donations from a company that isn't profitable?
2. How come you didn't realize the PR disaster?

[enigmatico@mk.absturztau.be]

@Blender@mastodon.social For what? So that you can add AI slop tools to Blender? No thank you, I will use an old version that does not implement these or use a fork that straight up removes these. And dont expect people to be happy with this, you're going to lose supporters because of this.

These companies are cancer, AI is cancer, and you know it.

[shrigglepuss@godforsaken.website]

@Blender so gross. I wanted to learn how to use Blender soon, don't think I'll bother now. This leaves a bad taste to the idea now

[lumi@snug.moe]

@Blender the minimal morally defensible position is to reject genai entirely. it's inherently abusive technology, built on mountains of violence and has the purpose of devaluing humanity

if you want anthropic to sponsor you, sure, but then also have a full genai ban and a hostile stance against it

[scremlin@pizza.enby.city]

@thibaultmol @UkeleleEric @eden @Blender

Incredibly naive statement

[shadowfals@toot.cat]

@Blender@mastodon.social

Thanks for announcing this before I put significant energy into learning how to use Blender, because typically I name drop for the programs I use.

I feel bad for my 3D artist peers, tho.

[dianaprobst@mastodon.art]

@gruni @Blender How can I trust any of my work or development in AI-touched software? I can't keep using updated Blender in the future.

[drahardja@sfba.social]

@Blender Fucking hell. Nobody wants this.

[higgins@hachyderm.io]

@Blender This is terrible, if you can not understand why this is terrible you should not only ask yourselves if you are the bad guys, you should also answer yes.

[fireye@peoplemaking.games]

@Blender damn this sucks; please reconsider.