Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels.

Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
stateofeu
137 Indlæg 74 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • reinald@nrw.socialR reinald@nrw.social

    @jon well Windturbines kill some birds, as a matter of fact. But it is a magnitude lower than car, glass windows/facades or cats.

    jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jon@gruene.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #14

    @Reinald Right. That was my point. I didn’t say it’s zero!

    reinald@nrw.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

      We know beyond any doubt that wind as part of the renewable energy mix is vital. It’s cheaper than nuclear. And sure, turbines make some noise - so don’t build them next to homes. Which you don’t anyway. #StateOfEU

      jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.pt
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #15

      @jon but what about space for new housing development? The rich don't want to buy luxury homes in the middle of the nature and have a wind turbine near them! /s

      jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.pt

        @jon but what about space for new housing development? The rich don't want to buy luxury homes in the middle of the nature and have a wind turbine near them! /s

        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jon@gruene.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #16

        @jt_rebelo they’re not buying homes in Bourgogne or the plains of Brandenburg!

        jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

          @Reinald Right. That was my point. I didn’t say it’s zero!

          reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reinald@nrw.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #17

          @jon I read "they don't, you jerk" as "turbines kill no birds" :-).

          And climate change will kill way more. Same argument for "woods instead of windturbines"... Climate change will kill way more woods. Even wildfires these days kill more wood than building turbines...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

            @jt_rebelo they’re not buying homes in Bourgogne or the plains of Brandenburg!

            jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.pt
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #18

            @jon yet (not even kidding, they are always looking for more and more undeveloped space, in my country they'd set fire to protected areas on a certain municipality, until the then president and municipal assembly ruled that wherever it burned it would be impossible to build for 50 years; no more fires happened since then, and it is a green area in a country rife with forest fires, it's just a coincidence, I'm sure).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

              Also making the case for new nuclear in France right now after the headaches nuclear had with cooling water this summer. WHAT? #StateOfEU

              reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              reinald@nrw.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #19

              @jon I think France stopped funding research on SMRs last year, AFAIR?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                “And those turbines you see in Brandenburg approaching Berlin are so UGLY!” he went on. Climate change, that’s ugly. #StateOfEU

                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kevinrns@mstdn.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #20

                @jon

                Talk like that should be SHUT DOWN like racism.

                I'm serious, I haven't heard it for so long, if I heard it now I would react as if they were promoting slavery and race war.

                #shutDown #climate

                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                  Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels. Damn we‘re fucked. Fucked. Our notional political elite is believing in utter complete garbage.

                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #21

                  @jon

                  Much of the intergenerational wealth of the 1% is reliant on fossil fuel "forever" investments.

                  The Moneyed never handle transitions very well.

                  Landed gentry fought democratic reform for decades. French & Russian revolutions were the result.

                  It took two world wars to end the British Empire's grip on global trade.

                  It looks like another world war is brewing as fossil fuel interests fight the switch to renewable energy.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                    Also making the case for new nuclear in France right now after the headaches nuclear had with cooling water this summer. WHAT? #StateOfEU

                    mrtnsnp@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrtnsnp@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrtnsnp@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #22

                    @jon but you really need to maintain a dependency on Russian resources. If it isn’t gas, then it must be uranium.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                      “And those turbines you see in Brandenburg approaching Berlin are so UGLY!” he went on. Climate change, that’s ugly. #StateOfEU

                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jon@gruene.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #23

                      And there was another line. “It’s rich landowners in Brandenburg taking the subsidies from the state to build wind turbines”. This is an equality / distribution issue, not an energy issue! Think of the opposite: “we shouldn’t build turbines there because the land owners are rich!” Errrr… #StateOfEU

                      giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG moritzkraehe@zug.networkM ignaloidas@not.acu.ltI jon@gruene.socialJ cyrevolt@mastodon.socialC 7 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                        Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels. Damn we‘re fucked. Fucked. Our notional political elite is believing in utter complete garbage.

                        thisislieven@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thisislieven@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thisislieven@c.im
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #24

                        @jon It's incredibly infuriating that most of these conspiracies theories have been blown up into the European discourse by one person - and it's not a European.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                          Also making the case for new nuclear in France right now after the headaches nuclear had with cooling water this summer. WHAT? #StateOfEU

                          henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          henryk@chaos.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #25

                          @jon The French have at least done reasonable modelling. The https://www.rte-france.com/donnees-publications/etudes-prospectives/futurs-energetique-2050#Premiereedition2021 compared new nuclear deployments to wind+solar plus all the work needed on the network layer (for storage etc.) came out at nuclear being ~10 billion €/year cheaper. Of course, that calculation was with 2010s solar prices, and before the final Flamanville III cost was known. Also at already 70% nuclear electric starting point, so not transferable.
                          I'm eagerly awaiting the 2026 report update. 🙂

                          hwa@infosec.exchangeH jon@gruene.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                            Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels. Damn we‘re fucked. Fucked. Our notional political elite is believing in utter complete garbage.

                            glynmoody@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            glynmoody@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            glynmoody@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #26

                            @jon part of the problem is that there is no attempt to get the facts out; so conspiracy theorists have a field day. we need govs actively to fight these lies, not just sit and watch them...

                            jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • steely_glint@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              steely_glint@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              steely_glint@chaos.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #27

                              @ilmari They can be - given the right artistic flourish :

                              https://www.messynessychic.com/2016/10/18/exactly-what-your-next-dinner-party-needs-nuclear-reactor-porcelain-plates/

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • henryk@chaos.socialH henryk@chaos.social

                                @jon The French have at least done reasonable modelling. The https://www.rte-france.com/donnees-publications/etudes-prospectives/futurs-energetique-2050#Premiereedition2021 compared new nuclear deployments to wind+solar plus all the work needed on the network layer (for storage etc.) came out at nuclear being ~10 billion €/year cheaper. Of course, that calculation was with 2010s solar prices, and before the final Flamanville III cost was known. Also at already 70% nuclear electric starting point, so not transferable.
                                I'm eagerly awaiting the 2026 report update. 🙂

                                hwa@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hwa@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                hwa@infosec.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #28

                                @henryk the same Flamanville III they just had to shut down for at least a year for critical fixes?

                                @jon

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                  And there was another line. “It’s rich landowners in Brandenburg taking the subsidies from the state to build wind turbines”. This is an equality / distribution issue, not an energy issue! Think of the opposite: “we shouldn’t build turbines there because the land owners are rich!” Errrr… #StateOfEU

                                  giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  giggls@karlsruhe-social.de
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #29

                                  @jon There is even an EU-funded project about Red kite and Wind turbines.
                                  Human caused deads of Red kite are caused by rat poison.
                                  https://www.life-eurokite.eu/

                                  simon_brooke@mastodon.scotS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                    Also making the case for new nuclear in France right now after the headaches nuclear had with cooling water this summer. WHAT? #StateOfEU

                                    amy@ice.ch3.stA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    amy@ice.ch3.stA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    amy@ice.ch3.st
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #30

                                    @jon@gruene.social providing nuclear power doesn't drain wind power, it supplements it. There are more than enough fossil fuels to replace; we don't need to, and we really shouldn't, just rely on one source.

                                    jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                      And there was another line. “It’s rich landowners in Brandenburg taking the subsidies from the state to build wind turbines”. This is an equality / distribution issue, not an energy issue! Think of the opposite: “we shouldn’t build turbines there because the land owners are rich!” Errrr… #StateOfEU

                                      moritzkraehe@zug.networkM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      moritzkraehe@zug.networkM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      moritzkraehe@zug.network
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #31

                                      @jon as opposed to all those small businesses that own nuclear, coal & gas power plants...?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • henryk@chaos.socialH henryk@chaos.social

                                        @jon The French have at least done reasonable modelling. The https://www.rte-france.com/donnees-publications/etudes-prospectives/futurs-energetique-2050#Premiereedition2021 compared new nuclear deployments to wind+solar plus all the work needed on the network layer (for storage etc.) came out at nuclear being ~10 billion €/year cheaper. Of course, that calculation was with 2010s solar prices, and before the final Flamanville III cost was known. Also at already 70% nuclear electric starting point, so not transferable.
                                        I'm eagerly awaiting the 2026 report update. 🙂

                                        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jon@gruene.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #32

                                        @henryk thanks. This is the sort of analysis I’m all for. It’s sensible, and give me numbers and I’m fine with it. Let’s see how updated numbers look indeed!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • amy@ice.ch3.stA amy@ice.ch3.st

                                          @jon@gruene.social providing nuclear power doesn't drain wind power, it supplements it. There are more than enough fossil fuels to replace; we don't need to, and we really shouldn't, just rely on one source.

                                          jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jon@gruene.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #33

                                          @amy Sure. I’m not ideologically opposed to nuclear. Fossil fuels are obviously worse.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper