For many big companies I feel like "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
-
For many big companies I feel like "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." should be flipped around. When a given harmful action is coming from them, it's probably with malicious intent, with a thin veil of something else hoping to reduce pushback.
-
For many big companies I feel like "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." should be flipped around. When a given harmful action is coming from them, it's probably with malicious intent, with a thin veil of something else hoping to reduce pushback.
@marcusxms I forgot where (probably mastodon somewhere) but I saw someone who wrote: "never attribute to stupidity/malice that which can be explained by profit".
-
F folfdk@helvede.net shared this topic
-
For many big companies I feel like "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." should be flipped around. When a given harmful action is coming from them, it's probably with malicious intent, with a thin veil of something else hoping to reduce pushback.
@marcusxms jeg tror den moderne udgave for firmaer er "tilskriv ikke til ondskab, det som kan forklares med aktionærer værdis optimering"
