Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions.

On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
78 Indlæg 56 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD davemwilburn@infosec.exchange

    @LynnD @sundogplanets I'm not sure this specific regulator in question, the FCC, has jurisdiction over visual spectrum space-based blinding, just RF spectrum. I don't know that we have a regulator governing that.

    davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    davemwilburn@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #67

    @LynnD @sundogplanets

    N.B., I'm not defending or excusing the absolute bullshit that's happening here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions. FANTASTIC.

      (Editing to add that reading more carefully, I think most of it is actually well-intentioned discussion trying to understand how the hell RO thinks they have any kind of business case. But I am extra grumpy because it's hot. No blocking needed.)

      Good morning to everyone except the people defending or funding Reflect Orbital.

      nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
      nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #68

      @sundogplanets How _does_ RO intend to make money?

      I highly suspect this is a fine example of the underpants gnomes.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        On a more serious note, does anyone know how to find out who is insuring Reflect Orbital? Seems like they might want to know the company they're insuring admitted in an official FCC document that they could cause permanent eye damage to people who look at their satellite through a telescope...

        wtl@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wtl@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wtl@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #69

        @sundogplanets It's a question worth asking in interviews too; and not just eye damage (which is of course worse!); a lot of expensive gear is pointed at the sky and they could damage all of it as well.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          On a more serious note, does anyone know how to find out who is insuring Reflect Orbital? Seems like they might want to know the company they're insuring admitted in an official FCC document that they could cause permanent eye damage to people who look at their satellite through a telescope...

          lumiworx@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lumiworx@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lumiworx@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #70

          @sundogplanets

          Seems like there's not much in the way of published details, but I found one article that offers an overview of risk assessments, and they mention several possible carriers in the 'Space Mission' category type...

          "... with underwriters, including AXA XL, Munich Re, and Chubb, maintaining specialized aerospace liability teams."

          https://dataintelo.com/report/space-mission-insurance-brokerage-market

          I assume launch insurance is mandatory, but is there a possibility that some types might be optional or even 'self-insured'?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD davemwilburn@infosec.exchange

            @sundogplanets

            Please forgive the ignorant question: Are we sure that Reflect Orbital or their insurers would even be liable under current statutes and treaties?

            dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianshuo@mstdn.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #71

            @DaveMWilburn @sundogplanets would only US law apply as it was launched from their territory?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              On a more serious note, does anyone know how to find out who is insuring Reflect Orbital? Seems like they might want to know the company they're insuring admitted in an official FCC document that they could cause permanent eye damage to people who look at their satellite through a telescope...

              petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
              petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
              petealexharris@mastodon.scot
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #72

              @sundogplanets

              Stupidest possible Day of the Triffids reboot.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions. FANTASTIC.

                (Editing to add that reading more carefully, I think most of it is actually well-intentioned discussion trying to understand how the hell RO thinks they have any kind of business case. But I am extra grumpy because it's hot. No blocking needed.)

                Good morning to everyone except the people defending or funding Reflect Orbital.

                bellegraylane@universeodon.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                bellegraylane@universeodon.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                bellegraylane@universeodon.com
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #73

                @sundogplanets we live in a weird dark mirror world right out of 007 or something now. The Rich, cosplaying as Janus or spectre or whatever, just creating things like goldeneye and people are being like, what a great idea! A gigantic mirror in the sky, what could go wrong? Lol. Except i don’t laugh because it’s not funny. It’s the plot device from a comic book villain written by AI.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • staceycornelius@zeroes.caS staceycornelius@zeroes.ca

                  @sundogplanets We need to find the source of the kool-aid and cut it off, pronto. For all of them. Geez

                  the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  the_wub@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #74

                  @StaceyCornelius @sundogplanets Cutting off the source of their oxygen might get more permanent results.

                  Plus it will reduce the amount of CO2 they produce thus helping reduce global warming.

                  So a bit of a win-win-win for the planet!

                  Although, thinking about it, as they decompose they might produce more greenhouse gases. So maybe carbon capture the remains in gas tight sarcophagous?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    On a more serious note, does anyone know how to find out who is insuring Reflect Orbital? Seems like they might want to know the company they're insuring admitted in an official FCC document that they could cause permanent eye damage to people who look at their satellite through a telescope...

                    staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    staringatclouds@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #75

                    @sundogplanets Insurance ? 🤷‍♀️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions. FANTASTIC.

                      (Editing to add that reading more carefully, I think most of it is actually well-intentioned discussion trying to understand how the hell RO thinks they have any kind of business case. But I am extra grumpy because it's hot. No blocking needed.)

                      Good morning to everyone except the people defending or funding Reflect Orbital.

                      emc2@indieweb.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      emc2@indieweb.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      emc2@indieweb.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #76

                      @sundogplanets

                      It's a horrible, awful, dangerous idea. Bad for science, bad for national security, bad for the environment, bad for progress, bad for human life.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        On first glance (pre-caffeine) it looks like there are a bunch of mansplainers doing math to defend Reflect Orbital in my mentions. FANTASTIC.

                        (Editing to add that reading more carefully, I think most of it is actually well-intentioned discussion trying to understand how the hell RO thinks they have any kind of business case. But I am extra grumpy because it's hot. No blocking needed.)

                        Good morning to everyone except the people defending or funding Reflect Orbital.

                        leo@mastodon.greenL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leo@mastodon.greenL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leo@mastodon.green
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #77

                        @sundogplanets apologies if my question came across the wrong way. I was merely trying to understand, not explain anything.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          On a more serious note, does anyone know how to find out who is insuring Reflect Orbital? Seems like they might want to know the company they're insuring admitted in an official FCC document that they could cause permanent eye damage to people who look at their satellite through a telescope...

                          craignicol@glasgow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          craignicol@glasgow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          craignicol@glasgow.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #78

                          @sundogplanets I guess it depends if the target area is under the right jurisdiction? Just aim it in an area where companies are already dumping chemical pollution 🤬

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper