Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. “I poisoned my own mind.”

“I poisoned my own mind.”

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
81 Indlæg 25 Posters 33 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • bonkers@nerdculture.deB bonkers@nerdculture.de

    @zrb @dalias you can, by the way, publish a policy for PRs, like:

    -- only a human written text in PR description, and it should actually explain briefly what the pr does.

    -- ASCII only. The clanker can easily follow this rule if you insist.

    zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ This user is from outside of this forum
    zrb@social.hildebrind.space
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #72

    @bonkers @dalias that was the first thing we did, and really all that does is weed out the people and automated agents that respect policies, and select for people and agents that don't. Companies already don't care about open source licenses, and don't respect robots.txt when scraping, so it's no surprise they don't respect community policies either.

    zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ zrb@social.hildebrind.space

      @bonkers @dalias that was the first thing we did, and really all that does is weed out the people and automated agents that respect policies, and select for people and agents that don't. Companies already don't care about open source licenses, and don't respect robots.txt when scraping, so it's no surprise they don't respect community policies either.

      zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zrb@social.hildebrind.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #73

      @bonkers @dalias also doesn't fix the slop code cobbled together in patterns without any analytical thinking or mental model besides "make the output pass arbitrary tests"

      bonkers@nerdculture.deB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zrb@social.hildebrind.spaceZ zrb@social.hildebrind.space

        @bonkers @dalias also doesn't fix the slop code cobbled together in patterns without any analytical thinking or mental model besides "make the output pass arbitrary tests"

        bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
        bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
        bonkers@nerdculture.de
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #74

        @zrb @dalias well, reject them. They are not vital for the project, but your mental health is.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bonkers@nerdculture.deB bonkers@nerdculture.de

          @dalias no, I'm just saying that it's a useful tool in an experienced engineer's hands. Everything else is your own assumption.

          violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          violetmadder@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #75

          @bonkers @dalias

          There is no understanding or real logic involved in LLM output. Only dice rolls.

          Those comments only say something that plausibly sounds like what the batch of text called a "comment" has been determined to be LIKELY to say.

          That's not a guess, that's how the thing works. The LLM is the thing doing the guessing. It isn't capable of understanding or reasoning.

          bonkers@nerdculture.deB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bonkers@nerdculture.deB bonkers@nerdculture.de

            @dalias no, I'm just saying that it's a useful tool in an experienced engineer's hands. Everything else is your own assumption.

            atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            atax1a@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #76

            @bonkers i'm sure there's a tool involved

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV violetmadder@kolektiva.social

              @bonkers @dalias

              There is no understanding or real logic involved in LLM output. Only dice rolls.

              Those comments only say something that plausibly sounds like what the batch of text called a "comment" has been determined to be LIKELY to say.

              That's not a guess, that's how the thing works. The LLM is the thing doing the guessing. It isn't capable of understanding or reasoning.

              bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
              bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
              bonkers@nerdculture.de
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #77

              @violetmadder @dalias you just shouldn't use it for things that need reasoning. It's pretty good at standard tasks, so keep it at that.

              violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • bonkers@nerdculture.deB bonkers@nerdculture.de

                @violetmadder @dalias you just shouldn't use it for things that need reasoning. It's pretty good at standard tasks, so keep it at that.

                violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                violetmadder@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #78

                @bonkers @dalias

                Comments need reasoning. Code structure needs reasoning.

                In those tasks, the plausible mimicry of what's needed is not just insufficient, but dangerous.

                bonkers@nerdculture.deB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV violetmadder@kolektiva.social

                  @bonkers @dalias

                  Comments need reasoning. Code structure needs reasoning.

                  In those tasks, the plausible mimicry of what's needed is not just insufficient, but dangerous.

                  bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bonkers@nerdculture.deB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bonkers@nerdculture.de
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #79

                  @violetmadder @dalias life is dangerous. The longer you live, the closer you are to your death.

                  Hammers and axes are dangerous, they can be used as a weapon.

                  We just have to admit that the clankers will stick around. We just have to minimize the danger.

                  violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chroma@raccoonisland.socialC chroma@raccoonisland.social

                    @brib @glyph @davidgerard Uh, oh, excusing people because they're weak-minded or surrender to “convenience” is not the way to go, I believe.

                    brib@bribstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brib@bribstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brib@bribstodon.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #80

                    @chroma @glyph @davidgerard I never used the words "weak-minded" or "convenience".

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bonkers@nerdculture.deB bonkers@nerdculture.de

                      @violetmadder @dalias life is dangerous. The longer you live, the closer you are to your death.

                      Hammers and axes are dangerous, they can be used as a weapon.

                      We just have to admit that the clankers will stick around. We just have to minimize the danger.

                      violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      violetmadder@kolektiva.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      violetmadder@kolektiva.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #81

                      @bonkers @dalias

                      Hammers and axes are primarily tools, first and foremost. That's what they are usually optimized for. An axe for battle is not built the same way as an axe for wood.

                      Machine learning is a massively powerful and potentially useful tool, sure-- but "AI" in its current form has been designed and implemented, intentionally, as a weapon. Hammers and axes generally have smooth handles, as a basic safety feature-- they don't dig vampiric spines into the hands that wield them. They don't PRETEND to chop wood or hammer nails while camouflaging jagged leftover pieces that are going to cause future problems. ...They don't read a fucking GitHub issue title and take it as a command to install an agent on your computer that starts doing who knows what other shit-- look, this analogy can't even BEGIN to touch what's really going on here.

                      Generative "AI" is a signal jammer, flooding the zone with an avalanche of bullshit that's poisoning the wells of information, junking up communications and news with crap, flooding software with unreviewable masses of code stuffed with time bomb errors at best if not malicious who knows what-- while the companies responsible encourage not just the devaluing of labor but de-skilling the whole workforce-- not to mention eroding critical thinking skills in general and trying to replace human interaction with their own social engineering. They're enclosing the digital commons, manipulating hardware prices to push home computing out of reach, stealing everyone's work, all while feeding surveillance infrastructure that would make the Nazis swoon, AND setting up the world economy for a devastating crash the likes of which we haven't seen since 1929.

                      But sure, let's act like it's just a cute little useful ball peen hammer that we just have to be careful not to bump our own thumbs with. Fucksakes.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT tanyakaroli@expressional.social shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper